The Pearled Bridge - Game Complete!
- Thread starter Alisha
- Start date
- Status
i would like to be excluded from this narrative
I'd honestly like to vote for you notty but if you use your power as you've said it it would prove you're not law, so for today I'd to vote another cultist off the volcano. I may have stated infs role but that was not me defending him, I still think he's sunny; The only two other people I'm leary of at the moment are twg and comp.
vote inf
(No shitpost art because im at work still, 11hours down 1 to go, then artwork time)
vote inf
(No shitpost art because im at work still, 11hours down 1 to go, then artwork time)
Infected_Alien8_ - 6 (Duffie, hipmeow, Matty, Mooglie, Omni, Shadow_Hunter3) (Sacrifice in 4)
Matty - 1 (Nottykitten) (Sacrifice in 9)
Rune - 1 (Unusual_Dood) (Sacrifice in 9)
TheWeakGuy48_ - 1 (Infected_Alien8) (Sacrifice in 9)
so why are you voting me then? can you not vote me for a reason that even you admit doesn't make sense? or at least justify why you think mafia would benefit from a jailer?
well you said you didn't want to vote notty because her arsonist thing would prove her not law right? but it wouldn't prove her not third party arsonist, which is also a big threat to us that we should off sooner rather than later - in fact it also wouldn't prove her not law since law could have an arsonist ability (although I kind of doubt it)
also you could join me in voting twg if you think he's suspicious and would prefer to leave notty for a bit
at this point I'm fine voting for either twg or notty, whichever has more interest
No, but this happened before you gave reason for your inactivity. When I placed first voiced my interest in lynching inactives then placed my vote on you, you hadn't spoken at all yet, and it didn't seem like I got any support at all. However, when Infected went for Comp for the same reasons, comp quickly gained more votes. It is also noteworthy that many of the same who voted Comp, voted Aqua as well.
The difference is pretty clear. A comp lynch quickly gained popularity whilst lynching you didnt, however the reasons for lynching you two were precisely equal.
And I didn't try to bandwagon you when I first voted you. I simply voted you and said "speak or die". And your reasonings for why I would have done so doesn't make any sense either. There were none under heat at all (except for Aqua slightly, but he was town) when I voted you, so there were none mafias to save.
Do you believe it is likely that just after I speak of how lynching day 0 under these circumstances is a bad idea, suddenly wants to recruit players to vote you 2 hours before deadline when there were tons of votes already put on people?
In fact, this was your second attempt on trying to get a lynch on me; with a sprinkling of "oh wait, rune wasn't included in this so he is sus" sort of tone in multiple posts:
And your third attempt:
I'm not even sure you genuinely believe all these were attempts at bandwagoning you but I will respond to that anyway.Also, you yourself admit that it's only me which you are suspicious about (You use the same reasoning again in Day 1) so again; you're either tunnel-visioning or at that point in time; it looked like you were desperately trying to defend Aqua which most agreed was scummy and resisted the lynch.:
The 'second attempt' was in the context that Infected was under heat for not mentioning 'Pinkunicornz' in his 'list of everyone'. He came under much heat, and I figured he hadn't mentioned your name either, so I pointed out. If anything, this would only make him more suspicious. I see in no way how you can believe that was an attempt at bandwagoning you but ok.
The 'third attempt' was basically that I had unvoted since I believed lynching under these circumstances would either end bad or nothing happen. Then Infected wanted to get everyone to vote who they truly believed were suspicious, as that would be the more beneficial for town (if most went for it) so I did. Again not an attempt to bandwagon you.
Just because I only find you slightly suspicious doesn't mean I tunnelvision you. And I have voiced several suspicions during today, not only towards you. And I weren't 'desperately' trying to defend Aqua. In fact, I wasn't defending him at all, I was neutral towards him. And even if I did I don't see your point, he was town.
And 'most agreed was scummy' is just a lie, as I there wasn't a single soul who did.
The reason why my vote might have been slightly unclear but I still believe that my vote put with 'Speak or die' posted shortly after this post on page 5 explains it well enough:
What I find very ironic is that you yourself is upset about that, while you yourself didn't write a single word about why you voted Aqua yourself.
Can I ask you what message you recieved in the morning and why you picked Kill? If anything picking Kill will most likely only benefit the mafias, as this is crucial information for them. If they can kill the town vig, their path to victory will be much easier. Town can't really use the information to anything. The only exception might be when we see a Kill claim and we will know he has it (except if cc'd) in difference to that we would only assume he has, if we didnt have the info. If you (if you truly are town) chose PID, TID or maybe even Block town would have much better info. I believe you might be telling the truth about role, but that you're a mafia. This might also explain how you claimed so early.
ok hi its me, long time no see.
firstly:
unvote
vote notty
i dont believe a word notty says and inffy has pretty much done most of the arguing as to why shes susp and stuff so ill leave that at that. secondly i just wanted to say im even more susp of twg and comp due to comps most recent post
firstly:
unvote
vote notty
i dont believe a word notty says and inffy has pretty much done most of the arguing as to why shes susp and stuff so ill leave that at that. secondly i just wanted to say im even more susp of twg and comp due to comps most recent post
this just goes full circle with twg defending comp and now comp defending twg which either means they know something about each other (i saw mentions of a shared trait or something) or they are maf buddies trying to keep each other from getting lynch. so im just going to say if we arent voting notty today i wouldnt mind voting twg or comp
Also forgot to respond to this
I don't either have a problem with most people who jumped on, but I will still take notice and possibly get more suspicious of several. Of course it might be all mostly townies, but I still believe you should watch out for some of the players as the action itself is favourable for mafias. For all we know most may even be mafias.
I don't agree with the assumption that ' player votes town -> player is mafia' either, but I find actions like that suspicious in most situations and will take notice of it. However, the action itself doesn't make me believe the player is mafia, but when there's a tendensy of a player continueing with these kind of actions I will consider that especially scummy.
I don't either have a problem with most people who jumped on, but I will still take notice and possibly get more suspicious of several. Of course it might be all mostly townies, but I still believe you should watch out for some of the players as the action itself is favourable for mafias. For all we know most may even be mafias.
Alright so, I try to catch up on those +/- 300 posts I missed.
I actually just quickly skimmed the text.
So correct me if I'm wrong but Inf and Notty are in conflict with eachoter. (So 1 of them is most likely to be mafia?)
Maybe Notty makes Inf look supsicious because, he seemed to be an easy target to make supsicious since he posts a lot.
And therefore its easier for Notty to find something to mok about.
Not saying Inf is cult or Notty is an intruder(?), I'm most likely still neutral.
Sorry if none of this makes sense.
Also Hi,
I'm not inactive
I just prefer to lisn to music before I go to bed then instead of spending my time reading the forums.
I actually just quickly skimmed the text.
So correct me if I'm wrong but Inf and Notty are in conflict with eachoter. (So 1 of them is most likely to be mafia?)
Maybe Notty makes Inf look supsicious because, he seemed to be an easy target to make supsicious since he posts a lot.
And therefore its easier for Notty to find something to mok about.
Not saying Inf is cult or Notty is an intruder(?), I'm most likely still neutral.
Sorry if none of this makes sense.
Also Hi,
I'm not inactive
I just prefer to lisn to music before I go to bed then instead of spending my time reading the forums.
- Status