Eat my ass.Mr. Meeseeks, could the deadline possibly be pushed back a day?
I'm afraid that the lurkers aren't going to be able to read and process all this properly in the current time frame and I also do not think that the matter we are discussing at the moment will be resolved.
Bitch.
It seems that that you take to support someone and blindly follow as the same thing, which is just wrong, but if your definition of them are the same, there is nothing I can do to try and talk you out of it.Ok, explain this then where you said you would "support him in anything".
Bitch.
But you said you'd support them at everything. In addition to this you still haven't given me your reasons for voting. I understand that you are sick and I respect that but the point still remains that you have sent four posts since you said that.It seems that that you take to support someone and blindly follow as the same thing, which is just wrong, but if your definition of them are the same, there is nothing I can do to try and talk you out of it.
Don't really know what more to say here, I trust my glib glob more than anyone else, so I would prefer if you didn't vote for him, but now that you have, I see my stringed option to be to lynch you instead.
What. The. Fuck.The time has got-damn come.
Vote Iggish
Iggish sent me a message last night, I was just waiting for him to lie about it. For some strange reason he believes me to be mafia and tried to team up with me and told me to communicate with code to him during the day, which I've done up to now to show you how fast he flips on me when I try to lynch him. :^)
So yeah he claimed a third party with a mafia win condition and he does not know who the mafia are.
what code?Iggish sent me a message last night, I was just waiting for him to lie about it. For some strange reason he believes me to be mafia and tried to team up with me and told me to communicate with code to him during the day, which I've done up to now to show you how fast he flips on me when I try to lynch him. :^)
So yeah he claimed a third party with a mafia win condition and he does not know who the mafia are.
What so I somehow say a string of words together and this translates to something else, how could you fit something so elaborate into one message?Saying certain words in certain sentences in paragraphs. Don't know how far I can got-damn elaborate this.
well if he said it in his own message then i'd presume it'd be 100% legal but ask aqua (in role PM tho)Saying certain words in certain sentences in paragraphs. Don't know how far I can got-damn elaborate this.
"Say X word in your Xth sentence of your Xth post if you're X"
For some strange reason he believes me to be mafia and tried to team up with me and told me to communicate with code to him during the day, which I've done up to now
you've made one post this dayGot-damn, we still got a second killer it seems. I had a theory that killing Bird person might've given the mafia two kills on the night after their death but it would be absurdly broken if they got 2 kills permanently.
Also I think we can safely assume that the mafia are probably Rick's gang/close friends now.
How would this benefit me in any way.I'll just give an example that it was like
"Say X word in your Xth sentence of your Xth post if you're X"
I'm gonna got-damn sleep soon because I have to be up early tomorrow.
It was an example then why didn't you post more and play along with it? I'm afraid you're being caught in a web of your own lies here.Yes it was just one post that I needed to send the "code", after all I said it was an e x a m p l e.
If you truly cared about giving info to the town, wouldn't you have down it earlier, not late in the day to attempt to wagon someone? I think it's obvious that other motives are at play here.I can't do much more to defend myself, I'm just spreading info to the town which I received at night.
Well I mean, it's all down to whether people believe your story, not whether they believe me. "Supporting" is the wrong word here. I mean, you come in late in the day with this story out of nowhere with no proof of the code. Your story doesn't explain any of my would-be motives for doing something near suicidal like that.I encourage all to read carefully into who is supporting Iggish and who isn't, especially if I get lynched today. Good got-damn night.
1. I didsuperhalo6 why didn't you answer my question on my activity and the second calling me out as evil?
I clearly stated that everything I wanted answered would be bolded and underlined. You seem to be nitpicking whatever suits you best. This includes putting suspicions on me. The lengths you are going to just to put suspicion on me is kind of incredulous.
I don't want to be the "you attacked me so I'll attack you" guy but I feel that I have to point this out.
You said I ignored you twice when you called me evil. You completely changed this to suit your situation.
1. You never called me evil.
2. You never specifically put suspicion on me.
3. You pointed this out like it was a big deal when no-one responded to it either and you didn't mention it iirc at the time.
4. You never gave me the example of when you called me evil the second time, coincidence?
2. This is debatable, and the wording of this question warrants a particular response, no, I did not singularly accuse you, it was apart of a larger post, which I am now referring to for justification of current suspicions - And the fact this isn't entirely out of the blue.Considering a cop cleared him, and Hunter (known mafia) accused him, it seems likely he is innocent
In all honesty though, my opinion of you being evil has became a bit stronger, cause the mafia has a positive association with Rick, which Scary Terry does, and the fact you are pushing for a TWG lynch, who a confirmed mafia accused
I said that I found you suspicious, waited 2 hours for you to respond, got no response, and proceeded with my vote.This is nitpicking at a gross level. You have basically taken whatever relevant information you can find and warped it into making me look suspicious.
Another example:
1.You attempted to put suspicion on me by saying that my activity had plummeted when in fact it hadn't.
Two hours later...Considering a cop cleared him, and Hunter (known mafia) accused him, it seems likely he is innocent
In all honesty though, my opinion of you being evil has became a bit stronger, cause the mafia has a positive association with Rick, which Scary Terry does, and the fact you are pushing for a TWG lynch, who a confirmed mafia accused
While me suggesting are evil twice now may have been a stretch, it is strange to say that bolding your name in a post about suspicious people is me saying you are trustworthy, considering bolded people were ones I found suspicious.Considering iggish's activity dropped off a cliff, and he ignored me suggesting he is evil twice now:
Vote Iggish
You are warping what I said, you had used Hunter questioning him as valid evidence, despite Hunter already being dead at this point.2. When I called you out on this bullshit you chose not to respond, coincidence?
Another example:
1. You tried to put suspicion on me by saying that I was voting for the same person as Hunter. What you failed to include was the fact that I had started my suspicion before he did.
Explain yourself
Bitch.
4. He also conveniently forgot to reply to two posts (one from me, one from hunter)
I may be a glip glop, but you flip-flop, you claimed he was mafia in this post, but now you are claiming he is serial killer.2. He seemed to make the connection between characters and factions with no proof. He was so sure of this fact that he was willing to lynch someone (he voted me because of my role in the TV show) when the game said "non-canonical" and at the time, we had no way of knowing to what extent it was non-canonical. In my opinion, the only way that he could've been sure of and made that connection would've been if he had some other names to reference off. And I think he discussed and made this connection with his mafia buddies.
I'm sorry to anyone that had to read this formatting atrocity of a post.Jolterino 1/8 -, Foggy
TWG 2/8 - iggish, Hunter
Hunter 5/8 - Unu, Weakguy, hipman, ooglie Danni
No-lynch 0/7
Not voting: mariosatr, Jivvi, Jolterino, Vino, superhalo6, a dumb cunt
No, you never called me evil or specifically put suspicion on me alone in that post.1. I did
And that post you referred to as probably silly or something sillier.2. This is debatable, and the wording of this question warrants a particular response, no, I did not singularly accuse you, it was apart of a larger post, which I am now referring to for justification of current suspicions - And the fact this isn't entirely out of the blue.
In the last 2 days I've been pretty adamant about lynching him. I'm not sure how me going after him recently, when I've been doing ti for a while, has changed your mind. Well, I'm hardly going to be yelling "you shall not pass" at other people. Of course I want them to help me as I believe(d) you are scummy. I would like to add that this post is reducing my suspicion a bit, but I'm still suspicious.3. My opinion of you later changed because of your ardent desire to lynch TWG, despite the evidence being on his side, in my opinion, and now you are lighting the Beacon of Gondor to get everyone to take your side, to lynch me, in particular.
I said that I found you suspicious, waited 2 hours for you to respond, got no response, and proceeded with my vote.
You waited between 10pm and midnight my time, on a school night. I was off my laptop and my phone getting ready to go to bed. Even if it was in the middle of the day, 2 hours without a response is hardly a huge activity drop-off.Two hours later...
But why did you stretch like that? That shows that you were willing to slightly bend the truth just to get me lynched.While me suggesting are evil twice now may have been a stretch
I don't understand this. Could you please clarify?it is strange to say that bolding your name in a post about suspicious people is me saying you are trustworthy, considering bolded people were ones I found suspicious.
A bit of hypocrisy here. I either don't understand this or I don't remember doing this. Please quote and clarify.You are warping what I said, you had used Hunter questioning him as valid evidence, despite Hunter already being dead at this point.
Yeah, because I think it was you who made the good point about Hunter (mafia) going after him which wouldn't make sense. I mainly think that TWG is scummy. There's also the chance that he is the godfather aswell.I may be a glip glop, but you flip-flop, you claimed he was mafia in this post, but now you are claiming he is serial killer.
Correct me if I'm wrong but originally, weren't more people voting him? If so, this is another example of you choosing what information you have to share. If not, then disregard the previous sentence.And you were the only two people voting TWG
1. I'm scanning the thread, but no, I can only see you and Hunter voting for TWGCorrect me if I'm wrong but originally, weren't more people voting him? If so, this is another example of you choosing what information you have to share. If not, then disregard the previous sentence.
2. You posted half an hour before that, so I assumed that you were still active and intentionally avoiding answering itYou waited between 10pm and midnight my time, on a school night. I was off my laptop and my phone getting ready to go to bed. Even if it was in the middle of the day, 2 hours without a response is hardly a huge activity drop-off.
3. I didn't directly suggest you are evil, but for the purposes of mafia, being suspicious and being evil go hand in hand, it is more a semantic argument than anything.But why did you stretch like that? That shows that you were willing to slightly bend the truth just to get me lynched.
4. I bolded names of people I thought were suspicious, and I bolded your name, which means I thought you were suspicious, see point #3I don't understand this. Could you please clarify?
You posted that Monday, Hunter was lynched the Friday before that.A bit of hypocrisy here. I either don't understand this or I don't remember doing this. Please quote and clarify.
4. He also conveniently forgot to reply to two posts (one from me, one from hunter)