different girl altogetherIs it the creepy stalker girl, the girl you were too pussy to ask out, or your sister?
i can talk in discord if you want, no sense in spamming the game threa with my private life
different girl altogetherIs it the creepy stalker girl, the girl you were too pussy to ask out, or your sister?
yeah since you refused to do itwell its your fault, you started clapping (or one of first)
and even voted me to pressure me into doing it as well
now i have started to actually be curious what could happen
Being reactive doesn't mean that I'm taking a lead or scumhunting. Your accusation came out of nowhere and had little justification, that's why I became suspicious.1) You probably saw what I meant when he becomes over-reactive but it's probably me being paranoid
No, the weird posts were when you were accusing me with weird justification.The weird posts you're talking about are me theorising why the game is set out as it currently is. The reason why it looks confusing is being Inf is being an foolish boi as per usual and not understanding my thought process. Also, I have not been protective at all of being Canadian, you have been the more defensive one but I am sorry if I was sudden with my accusations when it came to you and I'm sorry if it causes some confusion. I will also try to give answers to your questions later on.
That's exactly what I pointed out when it came to Australia. If anything, maybe their PM would be noticeable but that's it. Right now, Iggy is the most suspicious because he pulled the same shit before when he was third party and nearly got away with it. I would not trust Iggy to lead the selection process in the slightest because he did that last time and really assisted the Mafia because of it.
It could also be the Five Eye member countries, which includes Australia, Canada, US AND the UK. But this doesn't take into account of Ireland. Ireland may be a small country, but politically has a huge background and general effect on the political climate, this includes it's past history with the IRA which still has consequences to this day and also modern history such as Brexit. So I don't accept Iggy's argument that Ireland is insignificant. If anything, other than China infiltrating Australia, Australia has nothing close to Ireland and is a hell of a more insignificant so why the hell does Australia have so many people? Could this explain why Australia has this many people?
Chinese agents are known to try to infiltrate BOTH the US and Aus and are 100% anti-capitalist. This could be Mafia who are Chinese agents trying to claim inno by picking Australia or the US. This could also explain why the person who is part of Ireland could be third party because of this.
We should begin my asking both US and Aus before we jump to Iggy because I find that a lot more suspicious.
I'll have a proper read of the thread later but since it's Christmas, I'm on my phone.
I mean, you say I pulled the same shit last game but... I didn't. Last game I basically had an agenda against TWG where I would snap at any possibility to get him lynched and so benefit the mafia. You also said that I was leading a lynch wagon and being very vocal to lynch people. Well no, I wasn't. You then say that my argument is flawed because Ireland is more important then Australia in your opinion which I don't think is relevant at all. It just seems pretty sketchy and erratic.For instance, like I said trying to be the leader of the lynch/the most vocal one to try to get the lynch rolling. In the previous game, he did this to assist Mafia as his third party role was to interfere and make Mafia's life more easy. In this game, the third party wins automatically when Town wins so it makes sense he's doing similar plays to try to get people the least susp of him so he can win when Town wins.
For me, just comes off as pretty sensitive about being Canadian. You say you made yourself an easy target so therefore it's unlikely you're mafia because why would I mafia do that. However, you then urge people to try to lynch out of the opposite pool from which you're in. This could be just a coincidence as well but IIRC just after I said "there's almost definitely a Canadian in the game" or something you happen to reveal yourself as Canadian. As I said, this could be a coincidence or it could be you taking advantage of something I said so you could maybe justify your country.So me stating that I'm Canadian is making me a lynch target know? I held back for a second in case there was someone else who would be in case it was a mafia trying to claim that they were Canadian. In this country thing, we made ourselves easy targets for Maf. There is also basically one notable Canadian politician which Notty pointed out so if I waited and someone claimed, it would be easy to CC.
It's interesting to note that all of these counties are ex-colonies of the British empire as you see no one coming from France or any other country in the EU who are westernised.
Been reading but had lots to do so I can't share much yet but I will when I get time- webpaige: I haven't seen her post much after Inffy became active, but then again, neither have I. (Holidays + Christmas events, but I'm back now wooo) Now that we know she didn't silence Inffy I'm less suspicious of her, but I still have a weird vibe. Unsure about her alignment right now.
Gonna point this out since I've seen this said twice now and forgot to mention it before, but Rune actually claimed Canadian before you mentioned Canada, but you didn't see him say it, so he said it again after you talked about Canada.This could be just a coincidence as well but IIRC just after I said "there's almost definitely a Canadian in the game" or something you happen to reveal yourself as Canadian. As I said, this could be a coincidence or it could be you taking advantage of something I said so you could maybe justify your country.
I'm Canadian
Unless Ender is Canadian, I've no idea why Jivvi would put an Irish politician into the game over a Canadian unless the Irish person had a special role.
Once again, this is just theory but it would make sense for a serial killer or third party role to be Gerry Adams who was head of the IRA. I don't know why an Irish politician would be included otherwise.
All of those are from the same page (5).Oy Iggy, I'm Canadian btw
So you were bandwagoning off of oog, rather than TWG?The inf vote was in response to a point Oog made, not TWG which is why I called infs large text out as quoting me out of context as he represented my post as if it were bandwagoning off whatever shit TWG said (I can't even remember now)
Okay but surely the fact that I am now speaking means that I didn't have this intention...?Which is a really bad defence, because A) it would make sense for the censor to target inf again as to force suspicion towards him to make him seem as if he were lying, because censoring anyone else would instantly almost 100% prove a censor exists (except for if the second point happened, although outing one as mafia would not prove there wasn't a 3rd party censor who was maf sided)
As I said, to generate discussion, and it worked (at least partially).and B) because... what? Like why would a townie pretend to be censored it makes no sense what so ever. And please don't give me the bullshit defence that he never confirmed it by rating a post so he didn't technically lie because he saw the posts and chose to ignore them.
Well if I was trolling, I'm obviously not anymore, so I'm no longer detrimental. Sounds like an excuse to keep your vote on me to me!!I'm keeping my vote on inf as he's clearly some form of non-town role or trolling both of which are detrimental
I mean to be fair your posts are extremely disjointed in my opinion. You randomly start new topics/thoughts in the same paragraph and it isn't very coherent to my brain, and I'm having a hard time understanding what you're trying to say a lot of the time. I'm not sure if this is indicative of your alignment but I've never noticed you like this before. Maybe you're struggling to remain coherent and linear in your thought process because you have a secret objective clouding your thoughts??The reason why it looks confusing is being Inf is being an foolish boi as per usual and not understanding my thought process.
But where does he take the lead, like you said he did?1) You probably saw what I meant when he becomes over-reactive but it's probably me being paranoid
But Iggish wasn't being extremely vocal about who we should lynch, was he? I mean after you've said that, he and Notty have been debating quite a bit, but when you said this he hadn't even voted anyone or said anyone was probably Mafia or anything, so why did you talk about this as if he's doing it this game as well?Green = Last game, Iggish was very reactive/extremely vocal when it came to who to lynch. When it came to the end, we found out that his role was a third party which would win if Mafia wins. The 'shit' which iggish does is the fact that under pressure, or in general when he is in a role such as third party or mafia, he becomes more animated/reactive in his conversation.
In fact, reading this again, this doesn't make sense does it? You're saying that, he's acting the same as last game, when he as mafia, on purpose, so that he can not be seen as suspicious and can win when town wins. Why would acting like he acted when he was Mafia make him less suspicious?3) I mean, if you looked back at the last mafia game; his style of play there when he was third party is similar to this current play style.
For instance, like I said trying to be the leader of the lynch/the most vocal one to try to get the lynch rolling. In the previous game, he did this to assist Mafia as his third party role was to interfere and make Mafia's life more easy. In this game, the third party wins automatically when Town wins so it makes sense he's doing similar plays to try to get people the least susp of him so he can win when Town wins.
Also, why did you say that Iggish is most suspicious, and then say that we shouldn't focus on him because you find US/Aus more suspicious? Even though he's in US (I think)?
Looking back, I also find your reason for not voting Iggish a bit weird.Right now, Iggy is the most suspicious
We should begin my asking both US and Aus before we jump to Iggy because I find that a lot more suspicious.
You say the reason you didn't vote him was because you could see where I was coming from when I said he was acting "a tad" different last game, but you only seem to agree with this (since you only say this) after I said it. Before that, you seemed pretty sure that Iggish was acting very similar to last game and even used that as the reason for saying he was the most suspicious.And I can see where Inf is going by saying his play style is a tad different than last game, which is the reason why I'm not voting him straight away. Inf didn't go ahead and vote for his people that he found suspicious since that's his suspicions and not something definite. I'm doing the same thing because I don't want to lynch him just because of something that he did last game. Though on the other hand, could Jivvi have made Iggy the Irish one because it makes the most sense than someone else?
Right now, Iggy is the most suspicious because he pulled the same shit before when he was third party and nearly got away with it. I would not trust Iggy to lead the selection process in the slightest because he did that last time and really assisted the Mafia because of it.
So why didn't you vote for him back then, before I said that Iggish was acting differently? And if you already thought that he was acting a bit differently yourself, then why didn't you say so before?3) I mean, if you looked back at the last mafia game; his style of play there when he was third party is similar to this current play style.
For instance, like I said trying to be the leader of the lynch/the most vocal one to try to get the lynch rolling. In the previous game, he did this to assist Mafia as his third party role was to interfere and make Mafia's life more easy. In this game, the third party wins automatically when Town wins so it makes sense he's doing similar plays to try to get people the least susp of him so he can win when Town wins.
Like, where did this apology even come from? It seems so out of the blue to me. Kinda reminds me of a point Ender made previously:Also, I have not been protective at all of being Canadian, you have been the more defensive one but I am sorry if I was sudden with my accusations when it came to you and I'm sorry if it causes some confusion. I will also try to give answers to your questions later on.
Although rune did say that he forgot the game existed at the start, and it makes sense that he'd become active only when someone started to appear suspicious to him, so I could totally see why this pattern that Ender described might emerge from a townie, but his apology to Iggish just seems to come out of nowhere, like a step back now that Notty has also stepped back.rune was quiet in the beginning and has now become more or less active, just in time to support notty in her absurd quest to lynch iggy
Why, "if that's the case" (I'm assuming you're referring to Jolt being Theresa May or Jeremy Corbyn), does that suggest to you that "there is likely one mafia in each of the countries with many people in them"? I just can't follow this line of thought.Double post
Jolt is most likely Theresa May and/or OHHHH JEREMY CORBYN.
If that's the case, there is most likely one mafia in each of the countries with many people in them such as the US and Australia. Like Eric pointed out, it's weird that it's so wildly unbalanced that most likely, someone switched to the other country. For example, there isn't a lot of notable politicians for Aus so maybe we should target that group of people?
...Unless you did see it, and that's why you specifically mentioned Canada, as a way to seem like, although you missed rune's claim, you were on the ball about the nature of the setup and helpful to town???!11//Gonna point this out since I've seen this said twice now and forgot to mention it before, but Rune actually claimed Canadian before you mentioned Canada, but you didn't see him say it, so he said it again after you talked about Canada.
I mean I don't believe this for a second you just want everyone to say clap so you can winyou help me get stronger by clapping and i avert your loss by killing trump if i get an ability that helps me do that
Alright so to play along, if Trump does die do you instantly win or is there more? What happens when you win(assuming the game goes on), will you be removed for winning or keep playing?you don't believe in a JEB SURGE?
i should win if trump diesAlright so to play along, if Trump does die do you instantly win or is there more? What happens when you win(assuming the game goes on), will you be removed for winning or keep playing?
Well I would suggest we all clap and you promise to attempt to help the town win once you've reached your win conditioni should win if trump dies
i believe i'll just keep playing if that happens, that's usually the case for third parties
How does this generate discussion? All you did was derail the thread with people hypothesising about a censor, nothing of value was gained.It's weirdly reminiscent of when Jolterino posted that dumb poem to throw people off when Notty was bandwagoning him, but there was no focus on you; so unless the intended discussion was your lynching or somehow the bandwagon of someone else for no real reason other than your lies then...As I said, to generate discussion, and it worked (at least partially).
Well if I was trolling, I'm obviously not anymore, so I'm no longer detrimental. Sounds like an excuse to keep your vote on me to me!!
to quickly answer first point, since when does agreeing with someone enough to influence your vote = bandwagon? Besides it was more to apply pressure to you to see what you would do. I honestly wish more people would have done then you would be confirmed scum as soon as you broke and jumped out of this shit charade.So you were bandwagoning off of oog, rather than TWG?
Okay but surely the fact that I am now speaking means that I didn't have this intention...?
Yeah Oog geeAlso in regards to the whole "c-word" thing, Oog seems to be repeating it over and over and trying to make it seem like more of a joke than a potential thing, pulling away attention from the severity it could possess. I can't remember how it started so if someone could fill me in that'd be great.
I mean he was just not talking for a while it's hardly that much of scum move. He probably stopped it since it's Inf and he wanted to spam the thread again. I actually town-read Inf so yeah no I don't think he's scummy.I IMPLORE EVERYONE -blablabla-