CAPITALISM MAFIA
- Thread starter Jivvi
- Start date
Aghhhhhh. How is bringing up Canada weird?
I used Canada as an example as it is more significant then Ireland. I was pointing out that my theory would be flawed if there was a Canadian role. I chose Canada over New Zealand and Guyana as it is much more influential. While I used Canada, my theory still would've been flawed if there had been a New Zealand(ish?) politician or a Guyanian(?) one. My point was why include a small country like Ireland if you are not going to include a more significant country like Canada.
Out of three options to pick (Canada,Guyana,New Zealand), Canada being by far the most significant, why is it weird that I mentioned Canada?
I'm just in your head so obviously it was <o>. Guess I should have kept taunting
Never WE MUST TAKE BACK THE MEMES OF PRODUCTION
The game is called "CAPITALISM MAFIA"and the conservative party is more capitalist in the US (even though both are very capitalist). Unless you have a better idea I don't know any other politician involved with clapping.
Also,
You explain why you're not mafia, but that doesn't mean you can't be a bad third-party member, like the autocrat.
P.S.:
you're a loser <3
also (idk if someones already brought it up i feel like i might have briefly seen it)
but if there is a serial killer MY BETS TED CRUZ who we all know is the ZODIAC KILLER who was born in CANADA
EH RUNE???? (i know i just said it was possible it was iggy gotta keep all doors open!!)
but if there is a serial killer MY BETS TED CRUZ who we all know is the ZODIAC KILLER who was born in CANADA
EH RUNE???? (i know i just said it was possible it was iggy gotta keep all doors open!!)
Yeah, I just meant that since you based your suggestion on the idea that they're capitalist, and therefore would fit the theme, I'm assuming your role is a capitalist role, since otherwise I don't see why you'd have that thought process, which maybe means something.
Well what would I gain as autocrat by doing what I did? If autocrat's goal is to survive then I'd say it was a very risky play on my part to do something which could pretty easily put me in a difficult place, but then again, I could also have done it so that I could use that exact same argument and look trustworthy, so I guess you'll never know <3
fight me
That's exactly what I pointed out when it came to Australia. If anything, maybe their PM would be noticeable but that's it. Right now, Iggy is the most suspicious because he pulled the same shit before when he was third party and nearly got away with it. I would not trust Iggy to lead the selection process in the slightest because he did that last time and really assisted the Mafia because of it.
It could also be the Five Eye member countries, which includes Australia, Canada, US AND the UK. But this doesn't take into account of Ireland. Ireland may be a small country, but politically has a huge background and general effect on the political climate, this includes it's past history with the IRA which still has consequences to this day and also modern history such as Brexit. So I don't accept Iggy's argument that Ireland is insignificant. If anything, other than China infiltrating Australia, Australia has nothing close to Ireland and is a hell of a more insignificant so why the hell does Australia have so many people? Could this explain why Australia has this many people?
Chinese agents are known to try to infiltrate BOTH the US and Aus and are 100% anti-capitalist. This could be Mafia who are Chinese agents trying to claim inno by picking Australia or the US. This could also explain why the person who is part of Ireland could be third party because of this.
We should begin my asking both US and Aus before we jump to Iggy because I find that a lot more suspicious.
I'll have a proper read of the thread later but since it's Christmas, I'm on my phone.
You could be a fool, we don't know what roles are in the game after all!
I'll rek you NERD
You can't expect people to claim stuff when you don't do it yourself! Your post is missing your claim!
But I dont know what I am google tells me all kind of different things, I'm a democrat though aren't they like left-ish?
Yeah tbh I feel like Jivvi just included politicians he knew, it doesn't seem like he put tons of effort into making it all match up with some flavour story or whatever since he didn't really seem to care about hosting and even said that the game would be underwhelming.
That's true but then why would I do something which I could easily defend against, if I wanted to be lynched??? I'd just behave normally because I get lynched all the time anyways.
I'm a bit confused here. What are you referring to when you say "That's exactly what I pointed out when it came to Australia"? And what do you mean by "their PM would be noticeable"? And what "same shit" did Iggish pull last time that he nearly got away with?
Well, yes this is the first time I haven't gotten the townie feeling from TheWeak, and it's noteworthy that I actually have been correct about Weak's innocence in e v e r y game. However, so far in this this game I haven't recieved the same feeling, and I believe one of the reasons is that he has tried to not put himself in suspicion, something he so often tend to do. For instance I noticed that he unlike the early stages of other previous games, actually shared his opinion about the situation and he followed what could seem to be the general opinion on Infected, instead of putting the usual "I litterary have nothing to say", "people have already said my thoughts" which he usually does and it often put him under the spotlight.
It is also worth to mention that once we have ran out of evidendences in the privious games TheWeak(as town) quickly recieved many votes, because he has been an easy target for the mafias. However, so far this game despite we having no evidences (except for the countries?) pretty much only I have been suspicious of him, which could be because mafias are unwilling to for him yet.
Anyway, it isn't a really big suspicion and I would probably choose Webpaige over TheWeak.
Something quite interesting while I think about is how sure TheWeak seem to be that Infected is not silenced. At that time, I remember I was pretty confident Infected was silenced and it didn't cross my mind he would bring up a stunt like that, so the fact that TheWeak actually was right is suspicious, since he would know for sure Infected was lying if he was mafia.
Well tbh it's extremely early and he's not really said anything that could really be pushed on him as suspicious I don't think, but okay thanks for answering. Yeah his certainty about me not being silenced, and his willingness to call it a dumb move on Jivvi's part, if a silencer existed, seems a bit odd to me too.
(As in, you'd think, if he genuinely thought it was possible, that he'd be more careful about being rude to Jivvi or something, but if he was Mafia and knew the silencer didn't exist (or at least thought he knew) then it'd be safe for him to do that. Or maybe he just didn't care idk.)
And this:
was in response to this:
in case that wasn't clear
1)
2) Pretty much same quote but let me ask you, do you know any other current politician other than Malcolm Turnbull who is their PM or/and maybe Tony Abbott?
3) I mean, if you looked back at the last mafia game; his style of play there when he was third party is similar to this current play style.
For instance, like I said trying to be the leader of the lynch/the most vocal one to try to get the lynch rolling. In the previous game, he did this to assist Mafia as his third party role was to interfere and make Mafia's life more easy. In this game, the third party wins automatically when Town wins so it makes sense he's doing similar plays to try to get people the least susp of him so he can win when Town wins.
Could we also start talking about the possibility of my idea that Mafia have most likely declared them being either American or Australian due to Mafia most likely being some communist which would correlate to the games premise that innos are capitalist and that most likely communist such as chinese? This could explain the imbalance other than Jivvi including a ton for the sake of it?
Okay. I'm a bit confused as to how you saying that there isn't a lot of notable politicians for Canada has anything to do with Notty's theory for Iggish though? Or am I just completely misunderstanding what you're saying?
Oh do you mean Prime Minister rather than Private Message, when you say PM? I think that's where I'm getting confused
I disagree about your third point, I think he's playing pretty differently this time around, and if anything, his reactions to Notty's pressure makes me lean towards trusting him a little. I don't really see where he's tried to take the lead either, where did he do that? I've only seen erik do that so far.
Also, why did you say that Iggish is most suspicious, and then say that we shouldn't focus on him because you find US/Aus more suspicious? Even though he's in US (I think)?