Just to answer those whom want me to explain my suspiciousnessity:
The jump on Claire wasn't supposed to be a jump or atleast look that way idk, it was more of me trying to drop the general observations I had made, not realising Oak had made a post before me, I was tired at the time so eh.
The inf vote was in response to a point Oog made, not TWG which is why I called infs large text out as quoting me out of context as he represented my post as if it were bandwagoning off whatever shit TWG said (I can't even remember now)
Generally still petitioning for an inf lynch, his larger posts seemed like they were trying to force suspicion onto people over trying to actually out the mafia which rings scum to me, plus the whole non-speaking thing which is just... idek.
He argues it proves he's not mafia:
If anyone's wondering why it would be a really bad idea for a mafia member to do what I did, it's because, there are two likely possible endings to my little plan, if I kept it going:
1) The following day, when nobody else was silenced (because the silencer doesn't exist, and I made him up as mafia[ha slip XD]), it'd be really suspicious of me to be the only silenced person, people would think I did the same tactic as last time where I made up an attack on myself so that I'd look innocent, and I'd be lynched
2) The way to ensure that ^ doesn't happen is for the entire mafia team to take it in turns pretending to be silenced so that it looks legit, but then, once one of us is revealed to be mafia, which would inevitably happen at some point, it'd be pretty obvious what was going on and the lynch list would consist of all of us who pretended to be silenced, because the silencer only really makes sense as a mafia role so they wouldn't target their own team so it'd look like a staged plan, and we'd all die and lose
Which is a really bad defence, because A) it would make sense for the censor to target inf again as to force suspicion towards him to make him seem as if he were lying, because censoring anyone else would instantly almost 100% prove a censor exists (except for if the second point happened, although outing one as mafia would not prove there wasn't a 3rd party censor who was maf sided)
and B) because... what? Like why would a townie pretend to be censored it makes no sense what so ever. And please don't give me the bullshit defence that he never confirmed it by rating a post so he didn't
technically lie because he saw the posts and chose to ignore them.
This entire thing makes no sense unless inf is some jester role who has to lie in order to get lynched which could make sense having some lying, political suicide role in a game about capitalism but yeah
I'm convinced there is no way a townie taking the game serious wouldn't announce they weren't censored immediately, so I'm keeping my vote on inf as he's clearly some form of non-town role or trolling both of which are detrimental
Also to comment on the whole Notty-Iggish thing, I understand where iggish was coming from, his graphs do clear that up a lot tbh I do think those serious about suspecting him based on his point tunnel visioned that cus it does explain his point (Tho I disagree as there can be multiple 3P roles in a game) I don't think his cracking under pressure makes him scummy since anyone can misspeak or contradict themselves when under pressure, especially when explaining an idea that is purely speculation. But he did seem incredibly over defensive so maybe he's maf and this post had nothing to do with it, he was just freaking out being under the spotlight.
Hk is a scummy dummy but less so than inf
and Ender's being fairly under invested, that might be cus he's in another maf game with me which I havent checked in over a month, we're prolly both dead tbh or cus it's christmas or cus Jivvi is a bad host.
That's pretty much all my thoughts so far, feel free to pick apart this intensely and explain why I am Hitler or Putin or Trump or whoever the mafia boss would be I'm tired cus I've been in a car all day zzzzzz
