but referenced me being reactive after I was reactive in response to "when was I being reactive before you accused me of leading the town?"
What did you mean by this sentence? I can't wrap my head around it. Did you typo and mean to say "before I was reactive"?
Other than that I agree with basically everything you said apart from the name thing since he has dylexia.
I also agree that it's really strange how there's so much resistance to voting him. If he's Mafia then it makes sense - town aren't reading the situation because most of the posts against him are long-winded, and Mafia aren't helping lynch one of their own off for obvious reasons. We have people like Oak who lie and say that nobody's explained why rune is suspicious and therefore rune is probably innocent, and refuses to speak or participate, even when his question was answered.
If rune's mafia then we should probably kill oak next.
Putting that in huge writing since I feel like many people won't read this whole post, but anyway here's my responses to stuff.
Obviously not, but it would be better to ask who that politician is IF someone did claim as Canadian. As someone rightly pointed out, so far all of the politicians so far are pretty well-known politicians and it would be easy to point out Mafia if they used some random politician which isn't that well known to cover their tracks.
But this was day 1 when we only knew 2 politicians throughout the whole game. Calling someone out as Mafia would be a bit of a bold move back then and I'm skeptical that these were your intentions as some innocent scum-hunting move.
Anyways, if someone did vote for someone immediately for some suspicion without a definite picture then it does look scummy.
Is trying not to look scummy always on the forefront of your mind?
In the game of mafia, comparatives are everything. There's probably some stuff which can be taken the wrong way but the logic is there. Also, most people do this in Mafia and it's not just Inffy so I don't understand the argument of me sucking up to him.
Because you only mentioned me when you said it.
I mean, in my shoes I would say that there is a misunderstanding. When I was arguing that you were acting similarly, it was the case of you being vocal.
You said he was leading lynches. I mean I know you say that you didn't read his posts so just assumed that diagrams = leading lynches but I can't see why a townie would do that.
I mean, in my shoes I would say that there is a misunderstanding. When I was arguing that you were acting similarly, it was the case of you being vocal. This was then argued differently by Inf who said you were more reactive. I thought you being reactive was a better suit on what I felt about you so I changed my argument to adjust to this change. That's literally it, it was a mistake and not anything you were trying to imply here.
You have a case of Aqua-flu here. Why are you only just coming up with this defense now, if it's supposedly true? Because you just now thought of it, right?
Nope, at the end of the day, my theory was that someone in your country (US) is most likely scum. At the beginning, I thought it was you because of how you acted at that moment of time but when both of you worded it in a way which cleared some doubts in my head, I had some second thoughts and backed down. There were so many questions being flung about that I'm not surprised that I DIDN'T reply to these questions.
What things did we word "in a way which cleared some doubts in my head" that made you change your mind?
I don't see the point of cosying up to you because the tables could have totally been different.
What does this mean?
. In fact, you've been more adamant that I'm scum than I have of you which is a total flip currently; which is why you stuck with your vote with me instead of lynching Aqua which was pretty much agreed on with the entire town; including myself.
Why do you keep using what other people do/did as reasons for reading people a certain way? I agree with Iggish on your sheep mindset, it comes out in your posts an awful lot. Sure you might not be a complete sheep because you do go after people (well, Iggish, one person) but that was when others were already putting him on the spot (me and notty), and your posts keep mentioning what other people say/think which, as a townie who should be paranoid about trusting nobody, this is really weird to me. Makes me think your Mafia mindset is leaking out.
Thanks for now trying to argue that I'm a sheep again; and I love the use of a sheep sound BUT I'll try to clear this up right now. In that whole incident, I already thought that Inf was the townie because my gut feeling felt like he was town. Aqua was obviously acting a lot more scummy than he did, and therefore I voted for him because I wanted to get back into Runescape and grind my wine of zammys.
Why was he "obviously" acting more scummy? Why was Aqua suspicious? Neither you or Danni gave a reason. Just "he seems suspicious", and you both voted when it kinda became clear he was gonna die anyway. Danni said it was because he couldn't be bothered to write his own points, which I can kinda see him doing that as town because of his personality in werewolf but with you it feels like a scum trying to look town by offing his soon-to-be dead-anyway dead Mafia buddy. You never said you couldn't be bothered to give a reason. You just didn't.
Yeah, you're probably right when it comes to this since I've already admitted that what I did was prettyyy scummy so I can get where you are coming from.
This is a tiny point and probably completely over-analysing but the fact that your reason for agreeing with Iggish isn't that you agree with him about what you did being suspicious, but because you admitted what you did was suspicious, makes me think you're thinking about what you said and what you can and can't get away with saying. "yeah i said this already so i'll say this" as opposed to "yeah i agree with you now, so i agree with this". It's probably over-analysed garbage but IT MAKES SENSE IN MY MIND! #totallynottunnelvisioning
But yeah, I just wanted to ask what you think about other people (updated) about them being mafia or not and I'll obviously ask if you could reconsider lynching me/consider that potentially it could be the case that you guys are tunnel-visioning.
What about your thoughts on other people? You're spending like 90% of your time defending yourself and 10% jumping onto other people with little solid reasoning of your own. Where's your scumhunting?
Erik:
I agree with a lot of what he says, dont want to lynch him today. I do however find his idea bout the autocrat having a kill ability to be very weird, and whoever said this might be to divert attention from the SK role, might be correct.
What do you mean by "divert attention from the SK role" exactly?
pls dont kill me if any of what I have said is weird or wrong. I dont mean to throw supsicions on anyone( ok maybe rune), I just thought people might wan to hera my thoughts.
Okay well I'm gonna stop accusing you for now because reasons. I'll come back to you late-game if certain theories I have don't hold up. If my theory is correct then I'm sorry <3.
I can agree to most of your reasons for rune, to the point that I would be willing to lynch him, I would like to hear more peoples thoughts on rune though, especially inffys thoughts about him right now.
I think he's very likely to be scum. I don't have a solid opinion on who the autocrat could be and I'd rather lynch someone who I'm 90% sure if Mafia than someone I'm 10% sure is Autocrat on this day, so my vote remains on rune.
uh, no idea who were killed, but is the SK usually mafia sided our town sided or like third part everyone is dead?
didn't you just go back to check what unu/comp said about people because you thought it'd be a good idea to see what the dead people thought :thinking:
I mean uncharacteristic or not, the major townie read that nearly everyone has on you gives you that possibility to hide in plain sight which is why I'm bringing it up. Just the way I'd think the autocrat would want to be is leading the town so no one would notice that they're there.
But you were saying you thought I tried to stay hidden/silent but I accidentally made a mistake and took it too far, right? But me staying silent wouldn't have kept me hidden.
I think we're having different thoughts here regarding censorer. I was saying it as if censorer were mafia and then if I were mafia, I would want to say they're town so that even if people find the censorer, then they're safe from a lynch. You were thinking it as if censorer were actually to be town sided though and then I call them mafia so that another townie can get lynched. Misunderstanding in which side we were addressing the censorer as basically.
Well you were speaking from the hypothetical situation of you being Mafia in this reality so I was using that.
The censored doesn't exist. So they aren't in the Mafia team. So if you were Mafia in that moment, you'd know the censored wasn't Mafia, and so if they existed they would be an easy, convenient lynch for you.
Comp accused claire and vat and died
He accused jolt not vat
It's risky if there's a detective role that can tell what politician you are, or if you claim a politician that someone else has/is ill fitting
Yeah true.
Okay, I'm caught up now. Still pro-rune lynch. I'm sorry if I'm wrong about you rune but you've been extremely scummy this game.