I really don't want to lynch off of the name thing - especially after I recently brought up I make it a point to intentionally throw people off the scent when naming my roles in games so...
Idk it's suspicious to say the least that inf isn't a saint - I think that's the hardest evidence going for him right now, although his phrasing of his claim still seems susp to me.
UNU isnt a saint either though, and like i said there are thousands of saints
assuming stranger just gave random names its easily possible that a majority of them would happen to be names of real saints
just type in random names in google and most of them happen to be a saint
and my phrasing of my claim was that i undo deals and revoke the consequences of them, surely you can see how id have worded that poorly if i was truly saying that it only protected town from the negative consequences, but its worded fine if im saying it revokes all consequences, in which case its unlikely that the former was my intention
now, inf can cancel deals, which leaves it open for maf to be able to make deals with the devil. however, whats the point in that if the devil is maf.
the devil could be maf and also be able to deal with fellow mafia though. the devil could not know who the other maf are. the devil could also easily still be 3p.
also, inf, if you now think (afaik) that devil is mafia, why was there no n1 kill, besides me protecting aqua? There is no indication that besides the maf kill there is another kill in the game. mafia couldnt have been blocked due to the way the deals work. the only two scenario in which i did not prevent aqua from being killed (besides me lying ig) are 1) mafia decided not to kill n1????, 2) devil is 3p and bulletproof and got targetted by maf kill.
these options yeah, but also 3) that devil is maf but the maf and devil dont know who each other are.
to clarify im not saying its likely that any of those options are the case, thats why i said in my big post that actually its a 50/50 aqua's innocent, because i either believe a) the lack of nightkill n1 was due to some random theory that i come up with, or b) the lack of hypnotist role evidence is due to some random theory i come up with. i have no reason to believe either over the other, so to my mind its a 50/50
With all the evidence we do have the likelihood that I'm making up my claim is ridiculously slim yet Alisha and inf seem to be platforming it like it has a 50/50 chance of being true or not which is insane and giving me really bad vibes.
see what i said above. i agree its slim your role is true, but to believe its false means i have to explain the no kill, which means believing some other slim likelihood theory, so i think it is about a 50/50, not to mention vibes tell me youre town as well
5 saints is nonsense Imo, would completely throw off the balance of the game.
how