No, no and no. You're taking things out of context and misinterpreting them to fit your agenda.
You said very clearly that "Having only one little country among all those giants just seemed wrong." as your reasoning for suspecting comp.
Yes because at that time Rune hadn't claimed yet so the only claimed countries were the UK, USA, Australia and Ireland. Ireland sticks out like a sore thumb here. Ireland stood out here for me and so it felt wrong. I also thought he could be Gerry Adams and a serial killer. These are valid reasons for day one suspicions.
Lest we forget that you for some reason decided to change your meaning of 'little', up next you say "Yes, because Canada is larger and much more significant then Ireland."
In my eyes Ireland is little. Little was the wrong word to describe Canada but in my eyes it's still a lot smaller in comparison to the other three. I did not change my meaning of little here.
Yes, Canada is larger and more significant then Ireland, what's your point here exactly?
You proceed to claim australia is much more politicaly significant than Canada even though you throw shade on that argument by saying "Yes, to be honest I don't know a single Aussie politician and I know about Justin but that doesn't mean a country is more politically important then another.".
No, that is not throwing shade on that argument. I said Australia is more politically important then Canada. I then said that even though I don't know an Aussie politician and I know about Trudeau, that doesn't impact whether a country has more impact then another. The onyl reason i know about Trudeau is because he came to Ireland a while back but that's irrelevant.
How is this throwing shade on that argument? If I knew more Belgian politicians then French politicians, it doesn't mean I think Belgium is more politically significant.
So what am I saying here? I'm saying that for some reason to you the introduction of someone being canadian nullifies your argument against comp? Atleast thats what youre saying considering it was weird if there was 'one little country among all those giants' but nowthat canadas here(which you clearly stated is 'much more significant' and also physically bigger) somehow ireland existing makes more sense?
Yes because in my eyes compared to the other three, Canada like Ireland, although being more important then Ireland, is still politically "small" compared to the other three. A singular player from a "small" country stood out. Two singular players from two "small" countries don't stand out as much. That was my reasoning. If there was another "small" country, it would make comp stand out less and wouldn't necessarily make me think he's a lone wolf serial killer. I'm not sure how this isn't understood yet so I'll try to explain it in another way.
And no, I'm not trying to be patronising, just trying to make you understand my reasoning.
Yes, it does make sense as although it is bigger, it still only has one player, in addition to my opinion on it, making it "small".
I didn't contradict myself. Originally, the theory was flawless and then it got flawed when Rune came out as Canadian. This is also explained by the above diagram. Yes, it actually is out of context as one is about before Rune came out and the other is after.
So yes me saying 'you're just making stuff up' seems perfectly valid considering everything you've said so far.
Nope, it's not. I haven't made anything up.
Also, answer the questions.