Testing Tekkit Server
- Thread starter GmK
- Start date
A little portion? Little?They don't kill the whole land.
Just a little portion of it.
And by little, I mean even bigger than TNT.
if someone were to make just 1, they could destroy a whole house. Well, except for obsidian.
Well, compare that to nukes on Mo' Explosions.A little portion? Little?
Or Nuclear Reactor explosions.
Could I just say that I make transformers irl for a company. It took me AN HOUR to work out how to get it to work in-game. But god-damn it was satisfying to get it working.
:trollface:
So, we can keep it running, under three conditions:
a) Keeping a very low playercap
b) Keeping it basic and pure Tekkit, no adding of other fancy plugins, no economy, etc
c) Keep a cooperative mindset. The moment I hear of any more drama, bitching, stealing, idiocy and more on Tekkit, I'll shut it down, no matter who why what.
Things to ponder about: Whitelisting and some form of area protection for players.
a) Keeping a very low playercap
b) Keeping it basic and pure Tekkit, no adding of other fancy plugins, no economy, etc
c) Keep a cooperative mindset. The moment I hear of any more drama, bitching, stealing, idiocy and more on Tekkit, I'll shut it down, no matter who why what.
Things to ponder about: Whitelisting and some form of area protection for players.
@GmK, Would it be possible to install hawk tool though? We need some sort of anti-grief plugin.
Are you considering lowering the playercap? It's at 10 at the moment.
Edit: I think the playercap is fine, should keep it at 10 unless it's too taxing / a sudden explosion of players who wants to use the server. If we install an area protection + anti-grief plugin, Whitelisting should not be necesarry.
- A form of Area protection would do wonders - It's not intended to be a griefgriefstealkill server anyways, just.. enginering and architecture. I guess we should look into that.
Are you considering lowering the playercap? It's at 10 at the moment.
Edit: I think the playercap is fine, should keep it at 10 unless it's too taxing / a sudden explosion of players who wants to use the server. If we install an area protection + anti-grief plugin, Whitelisting should not be necesarry.
- A form of Area protection would do wonders - It's not intended to be a griefgriefstealkill server anyways, just.. enginering and architecture. I guess we should look into that.
Hawk is too resource consuming, wont happen.
Playercap will remain, it wont be increased is what I wanted to say.
All else - I dont have time to put effort in, so someone will have to give me the plugin they want added for any form of protection, preconfigured and plug&play ready to go.
Check le Twitter, Roob, it's the 25564 port now :3quick question, is there a new address for the tekkit now solitude's out? of is it gone for good?
Because Kap buggered off to London instead of sending me what he promised, *sigh* it's all up to Le Me again.
You can now protect two chunks for yourself, noone else can build / destroy in them. You can also add co-owners to the chunks to allow them to build.
@Wortho27
@Peter24
@EphemeralKap
@Duffie
@Le others
You can now protect two chunks for yourself, noone else can build / destroy in them. You can also add co-owners to the chunks to allow them to build.
- /chunk buy - Purchase the current chunk
- /chunk sell - Sell the current chunk
- /chunk preview - Preview the current chunk's boundaries
- /chunk list - List locations of owned Chunks
- /chunk info - List Owner and CoOwners of current Chunk
- /chunk clear - Sell all owned Chunks
- /chunk coowner [Action] [Type] [Name]
- Action = 'add' or 'remove'
- Type = 'player' or 'group'
- Name = The group name or the Player's name
@Wortho27
@Peter24
@EphemeralKap
@Duffie
@Le others
