SCP - Secure, Contain, Mafia [GAME OVER]
- Thread starter Fiestaguy
- Start date
- Status
Could... wait wat?did maf kill? Couldn't they use him in a final votecount? Is there some sort of an action transfer role, similar to the one I had in GmK's masquerade game?
Nine people are left.
Out of...Twenty nine originally?
With having killed only one mafia?
This concerns me greatly.
But you know what's funny?
I have four FoSes in this game.
You know what else is funny?
All of them voted for Raxo.
No one was willing to vote Raxo un til I did, despite the mounting suspicion.
Once I voted, everyone immediately jumped off GmK and essentially tackled Raxo, mobbed him, and drug him to the gallows.
Tim, Coolio, Ltin, Road, GmK, Chicken
Quoting posts in which people voted for convenience:
Coolio: Basically said "what he said" and added that he seemed certain the her and I were town.
Ltin: I take his post as "I had some stuff about GmK, but I can't find it, oh well vote Raxo he's hiding something"
Road: Literally just said "He seems to be backpedaling, oh and he's acting scummy vote"
I don't know why, but I feel compelled to pick at word choice here. "Seems" and "acting". What those words tell me is "Yeah, I'm saying these things, but don't want to fully commit if Raxo turns up innocent." I feel this is significant because if Road knew Raxo wouldn't turn up mafia, he would be hesitant to commit.
GmK: Made his post look nice and content-ful, but it was largely unrelated. The first paragraph is fine, it is responding to another point entirely, but then integrates a "crazy idea" about a third-party based setup into a reason to vote. If you actually look at it, his reason for voting was literally "this goes beyond his niormal level of 'newbish' play."
Chicken: Similar to GmK, he says simply "Yeah, Raxo doesn't make much sense." He also adds "I'm afraid this will turn out like iggy" as justification in case he turns out to be wrong.
At least one of Ltin, Road, GmK, and Chicken is mafia.
Maybe it's all of them.
Who knows.
I'm going to go back to my original vote from yesterday and
Vote GmK
Out of...Twenty nine originally?
With having killed only one mafia?
This concerns me greatly.
But you know what's funny?
I have four FoSes in this game.
You know what else is funny?
All of them voted for Raxo.
No one was willing to vote Raxo un til I did, despite the mounting suspicion.
Once I voted, everyone immediately jumped off GmK and essentially tackled Raxo, mobbed him, and drug him to the gallows.
And because the sheep doesn't like to put votes in chronological order: I'll do it.
Tim, Coolio, Ltin, Road, GmK, Chicken
Quoting posts in which people voted for convenience:
[/B][/QUOTE]
Tim: Originally mine had quotes, but I'm not good at quoting quotes so I only took the last bit. I clearly stated my reasoning that he was rapidly changing his words, repeating himself and adding nothing to his defense, etc.
Coolio: Basically said "what he said" and added that he seemed certain the her and I were town.
Ltin: I take his post as "I had some stuff about GmK, but I can't find it, oh well vote Raxo he's hiding something"
Road: Literally just said "He seems to be backpedaling, oh and he's acting scummy vote"
I don't know why, but I feel compelled to pick at word choice here. "Seems" and "acting". What those words tell me is "Yeah, I'm saying these things, but don't want to fully commit if Raxo turns up innocent." I feel this is significant because if Road knew Raxo wouldn't turn up mafia, he would be hesitant to commit.
GmK: Made his post look nice and content-ful, but it was largely unrelated. The first paragraph is fine, it is responding to another point entirely, but then integrates a "crazy idea" about a third-party based setup into a reason to vote. If you actually look at it, his reason for voting was literally "this goes beyond his niormal level of 'newbish' play."
Chicken: Similar to GmK, he says simply "Yeah, Raxo doesn't make much sense." He also adds "I'm afraid this will turn out like iggy" as justification in case he turns out to be wrong.
At least one of Ltin, Road, GmK, and Chicken is mafia.
Maybe it's all of them.
Who knows.
I'm going to go back to my original vote from yesterday and
Vote GmK
I'm just curious. with so little mafia deaths I'm still working under the idea that we are one kill away from mafia victory; as a survivor so long as they don't hit you wouldn't it be in your best interests to side with them?
And are you the type of person who would do that? Would you really side with the maf?
I play to win man. Depends on the circumstances. Untill a few nights ago I was actively scum hunting, was pretty sure town was gonna win. Now I wasnt doing a very good job, but still.
If I'd be a survivor I wouldn't givr a rats arse which side wins, since I win with them immediately. It's literally win-win to not pick a faction until you know you can win with them.
Well hypothetically if you were to...
Vote no lynch
It would really be in your best interests.
YOU DONE FUCKED UP SON
Ltin if you really are a survivor, then know this, they only have 3 GmK, chicken and road, its not enough for them at this point even if you do side with them.
I'm going to join in here with timdood
vote GmK
I assure you I've done the math... did you really think I would gamble the fate of this game on Ltin siding with us AND doing so fast enough to avoid the entire town...
I still have a knife, your math means nothing
I assure you I've done the math... did you really think I would gamble the fate of this game on Ltin siding with us AND doing so fast enough to avoid the entire town...
- Status