i visited tim last night, but tim's saying he didnt get the message to say it happened, so i must have been either blocked or redirected somehowHave you done that to Tim before? or were you blocked
i visited tim last night, but tim's saying he didnt get the message to say it happened, so i must have been either blocked or redirected somehowHave you done that to Tim before? or were you blocked
Sure it can't be discarded entirely but it could be a wifom gambit.im going to repeat this in bold since i think its probably the #1 argument for my defence
So the question boils down to "Why wouldn't I claim sinner?"seriously i want an answer from everyone voting me, why did i claim the role that i did, knowing i would look bad about it today, instead of claiming sinner and not having to worry about that? what was the purpose behind that?
if you can think of something then ill admit im the best lynch today, otherwise your reason for voting me has a huge hole in it, and if youre ignoring that youre either forgetting we're in mylo or you're scum
You don't get any sort of confirmation?i visited tim last night, but tim's saying he didnt get the message to say it happened, so i must have been either blocked or redirected somehow
it could be but there's no reason for me to make this wifom gambit instead of taking the 'safe' route of not getting myself into this messSure it can't be discarded entirely but it could be a wifom gambit.
hiding in the sinner pool is safer than claiming a role that will inevitably get me in the spotlight like this, surelySo the question boils down to "Why wouldn't I claim sinner?"
Because you know that hiding in the sinner pool is dangerous.
nopeYou don't get any sort of confirmation?
I remember this exact thing happening when you wanted people to explain how aqua's role could possibly be town...seriously i want an answer from everyone voting me, why did i claim the role that i did, knowing i would look bad about it today, instead of claiming sinner and not having to worry about that? what was the purpose behind that?
Let’s hear what Inffy has to say ?im going to bed, i request that nobody hammer me until i can make one final argument for why i am town this game (involving some admittedly shaky arguments but im just throwing in everything ive got). theres no reason to not at least give me the chance to do that. ive almost finished it so ill post it soon after i wake up tomorrow.
and i brought beta up several times but noone ever agreed
okaypeople seriously need to stop underestimating beta
what?I remember this exact thing happening when you wanted people to explain how aqua's role could possibly be town...
id play unsafe if there was a reason for itYou just made a bold play to see if you could. You and playing safe? Unheard of. There's your reasoning.
(not that id blame any of you since realistically its only reasonable you suspect me, and i understand that, this wasnt meant to be like a 'tee-hee im gonna flip town and its your fault!' but when i re-read it i think it comes off like that)but hey when i flip town dont say i didnt try my best to change your minds <3
we had a whole bit where i was trying to convince you aqua's role could actually exist, and you couldnt see it, dont what me you punk.what?
you barely have anything supporting your claim
the only way your claim makes any sense is if theres a hypnotist role, which weve seen 0 evidence of yet. which youve agreed with??
i dont get why people are acting like im throwing doubt at aqua when im doing the exact opposite
I just dont agree that having a hypnotist as you said be NECESSARY for aqua's role.
i mean unless you can think of another use for it ?
some snippetsi was argueing aqua was town
THIS EXACTLY.remember 'i think aqua is town but there is a 50/50 chance he's scum since his role cant exist in the setup'
no thats not what i was saying. i was saying that i think aqua's role can only exist if there's a hypnotist role. but i was saying i believed the hypnotist role does exist. i gave out an entire list of reasons for why i thought a hypnotist role was in the setup despite the lack of evidence. thats why i said i thought aqua was town.we had a whole bit where i was trying to convince you aqua's role could actually exist, and you couldnt see it, dont what me you punk.
it was part of the whole 50/50 bit you did.
remember now? dont make me quote the whole convo
psh... mortalsall game inf has been creating as much doubt as possible in everybody and not offering or pushing solutions at the same rate as he's casting doubt
he's literally satan
and i've called him satan jokingly in previous games
but he's literally THE satan in this one!
looks like i was right back then, and you did misunderstand what i was saying. here, a snippet of my own:some snippets
aqua's claim, if it is true, only targets townies and prevents them from being able to make a deal - and can also see if people are a town sinner or not.
this claim makes sense, but imo, only if we assume that the mafia have a way to influence town sinners decision to make a deal, because including a role in the setup that's only purpose is to prevent townies from making a choice thats theirs to make doesnt seem likely to me at all.
that must mean there's a role out there who can force town sinners to make a deal, and aqua's role would be town's only chance of preventing it, while ever that role is alive.
assuming you agree with everything ive said so far, and bearing in mind we havent seen any evidence of that yet, that means in order to believe aqua is telling the truth about his claim, we have to explain why theres been no evidence of such a role.
i have some theories myself:
- its an X-shot role, and they havent used it yet.
- they used it on the players aqua targetted, on at least one night
- they used it on saints, on at least one night
- they used it on fog, who already made a deal himself
- they used it on the devil, because they dont know who it is
- they did use it on people but the recipient only gets told about it the following night, and n1 they targetted sessy
all of these theories individually seem unlikely, and some of the options would require maf to be making ? plays by not targeting claimed sinners, though its not impossible. however, to believe that none of them are true, and that aqua's role is therefore useless, and aqua is therefore lying and is scum, is to also believe that the reason for the nokill night 1 wasnt because hk saved aqua (because otherwise aqua would be town), but because of some other reason, like the mafia targeted the devil and theyre bp.
imo, we have no real reason to believe that one of those scenarios is more likely than the other. the chance of the maf not knowing who the devil is or something is about the same as the chance that the hypnotist role exists but is X-shot, or one of the other examples i gave. there's no reason to lean either way atm.
and so my conclusion is that, at this point in the game, its like a 50/50 as to whether aqua's role is legit or not, when looking at it in isolation.
so at that point i decide to look past his claim and instead go back to his behaviour/vibes, in which case i still actually lean town.
thats also not what i said. i said there's a 50/50 his role would be scum/town looking at it in isolation, but outside of the role i thought aqua was town. i specified this 50/50 comment was in isolation multiple times, and said that my point was that the role could go either way, just like UNUs, so i wanted to look past that when making my read on him. i did explain this already. for example:remember 'i think aqua is town but there is a 50/50 chance he's scum since his role cant exist in the setup'
and i certainly never, ever said that his role cant exist in the setup. i said the opposite, as you can see in my "snippet" that i quoted above.genuinely i dont understand why both of you got that impression
ive said over and over that i think youre town
the 50/50 point is me saying "the claim could go either way, so im not lynching based on it, i want to look at him outside of his claim, for which i think hes town"
but you two seem to misinterpret it as me saying "aqua has a 50% chance of being scum so lets lynch him" but that wasnt what i said at any point