So aqua and ender both did really well in creating and presenting an argument supporting a vote against Infected and I agree with it, but there are a few other things that I noticed that I feel are important to out today.
First off I'd like to point out Notty's defence of Infected right after ender's post, this post here
http://escaperestart.com/forum/threads/lets-not-explode-day-one-party-hard.19474/page-22#post-377606
Now, notty argues in this post that hunter switched to infected as he was the easiest to start a bandwagon on but instead of voting for hunter as you would assume for someone who just implied that he created a bandwagon on infected to save his own hide, he instead votes for aqua with no real reasoning. This to me feels like a scum post, he took only a piece of ender's argument and countered that instead of trying to argue the whole of his logic, then voted aqua to try and get people to turn their attention elsewhere.
Jolteon also made a similar post which basically addressed the same thing as Notty
http://escaperestart.com/forum/threads/lets-not-explode-day-one-party-hard.19474/page-22#post-377605
Jolteon points out that the Civ's main goal is to survive and leaves it at that. He doesn't vote anyone in this but he doesn't really address the major points in ender's post, he just unvotes on the next page and then doesn't contribute anything further.
And its that which bothers me, neither of them really go out of their way to address the big points that ender has made or even aqua really they just sort of prod at them trying to poke attention away elsewhere, it all in all feels really scummy to me and I think if Infected does flip scum we should be weary of them in the days to come.
That being said,
#
vote Infected_alien8_