Okay I have carefully read what oog paraphrased, and some things do seem a little out of place, so ill comment on those in case anyone is going to ask about it:
1)
hk: -doesn’t want a long day 1-
Here i agreed with inffy when he said he wanted to post less, and if we let other people lead convos maybe the thread wouldnt get spammed, and we would not reach 50 pages on day 1.
2)
hk: wow maybe our roles are linked to HR in this HR chat
I dont use 'wow' that often (do i?). Anyhow, inffy wondered if there was anything special about the third floor. I in turn responded that i wasnt sure, and suggested that we might had been placed in the night chat because we were linked to HR somehow.
3)
wow inf you didn’t post at all but i guess you were busy!!
oog whats with me saying wow? instead of saying ^^, i said that to inffy i found it funny he said he was not going to post as much, but that it was crazy he didnt post at all. i then did say i guessed that was because he was busy. somehow i just find the was oog put this too blunt.
4)
hk: i believe you inf & i can be spokesperson
again i feel oog put this to0 blunt. after inffy made his post i explained how I was inclined to believe him, and gave my reasons why. Then i replied to where inffy asked us to speak for him if he got silenced again (which he thought was going to happen), and i told him i could do it if that happend.
5)
-gets pretty salty saying that he wishes he didn’t sign up and ASKS ME TO AGREE ON EVERYTHING & also clarifies things for inf finally-
Yes i did get salty, cus as you said inffy and I were stuck in some pointless discussion, which is the one thing i dont like about mafia. Then on top of that i didnt ask you to agree on everything, i asked you if i wasnt making sense or if inffy was being a b*ch. For the clariying part, as you said inffy wasnt understanding what i was saying, even though i thought i was clear.
I'm not sure if oog put some things in a different way on purpose or just cus it was a lot to paraphrase some things were a bit too blunt. However that "ASKS ME TO AGREE ON EVERYTHING" is, instead of perhaps a too blunt translation, simply not true.