I HAVE JUST WOKEN UP THIS IS PROBABLY A HORRIBLE IDEA
FIRST QUOTE:
Inf you still don't understand ffs. I did doubt you somewhat, I also considered it a possibility that you weren't lying. So it's not like I didn't change my mind I was just swayed by oogs post so my opinion changed slightly. You're acting like it was some massive leap in judgement to go from "hmm I think he's silenced but he could be lying" to "hmm actually I think he might be lying"
Because if you read this and ignore the insults it's hardly a solid opinion that inf is definitely silenced and it's not as if I go to he's definitely lying I say:
This never implied that I had a strong opinion either way I said "Lynching inf would determine whether or not there is a silencer" because it would give town valuable information regardless of whether you were lying or telling the truth. If you flipped town we'd assume you were telling the truth, if not you would be lying and we'd have a mafia/3p kill under our belt.
Secondly I even state "at this point we're grasping at straws" I was clearly aware this is not enough evidence to lynch you, it's just that it was the only lead town really had at that point. I had no intention of going the full way without looking back it was just a starting vote to apply some pressure. Yes I say the word "Lynch" but it's just a buzzword to make you spooked so if you were lying you would be more likely to break under the pressure.
All this makes sense as a defence but my problem with it is that it took you several days and a re-read and analysis of your own post's wording for you to come up with it. If all this was the truth then why was it so difficult for you to just say all this in the first place?
Your dumb plan was fucking garbage holy shit...
It got myself and others reads, so I disagree
Because I did a game ending 3P meme role, and I know Jivvi... he would too
Would he though?
That's one of the reasons I find it hard to believe that you v inf is a town v town scenario.
I thought someone said the democrats in America were central, not right wing?
What's that reason? I'm not understanding
Yeah, I'd be down for a Rune lynch but before I made the mistake about you lying, you were the most suspicious for me. While you were the most suspicious to me, I didn't want to vote for you as if you flipped town, it would make me look bad. It could also make it look like I had a win condition. I said this before somewhere just after you claimed Trump or something iirc.
It does seem a bit weird to me that you were fine to let someone who you thought was scum, go on living, purely so that you'd have more chance of survival, doesn't exactly sound like a townie-mindset, but then again the fact that you're so honest about it kinda makes me trust you. That's the thing about you, I feel like you've been extremely honest this entire game, I've had very little trouble understanding your thought processes, you've admitted to mistakes and ones that could make you look scummy, and yeah, if you're Mafia I think you're really sneaky
Lynching Ender is an obvious dilemma though. I don't want the game to end but on the other hand, we have no proof that it would, you could just be trying to get out of being lynched and we would be passing up the chance to kill someone scummy.
From the other side of the argument again, we'd be able to lynch tomorrow but if we let ender live, there might not be a tomorrow.
Aqua may also have some important ability that he can use for his buddies tonight, meaning that leaving him alive could be detrimental.
Would ender not have just won outright when he received the clap posts or do they normally have to survive the day?
The only time I've seen that is Aqua's game last game, and Aqua also thought that 'lots of vigilantes are third party' even when I've never seen that before either. Personally I doubt Jivvi would've included this in his game because he always seems smart to me but everyone's capable of doing something unexpected so who knows I guess. Personally I find it more likely that Aqua has a power that he wants to use tonight as Mafia, rather than Ender winning the game if he survives.
You're just mentioning this because it's exactly what you're doing and you're trying to downplay it like it's not.
Plus it's time for me to use the 'look if Aqua was town wouldn't the Mafia have lynched him by now? The low stagnant amount of votes proves he's Mafia!!'.
Yeah I thought this too, the fact that it's been so slow to lynch Aqua, and there's so much resistance purely in the form of refusing to give an opinion on him, makes me kinda suspicious.
On the other hand Notty (and Rune) seemed to completely ignore Aqua's somewhat reasonable defence and said it was just more 'inf misquoted me' even though that particular post wasn't and I'm paranoid that Notty's just wanting Aqua lynched for reasons other than scumhunting, but I also town-read Notty so
Ok I have a question (which may be a stupid question), but anyway, is it possible there's a role where they win if they get lynched?
Is it possible that somebody is trying to play a fool to get lynched so they can win?
Possible but like TWG said, seems pretty stupid to have that kind of role in a forum game, and potentially waste everybody's time and effort by making it end by a secret Fool role, so I doubt it. But who do you think would be this role if it did exist?
