/highwarn
- Thread starter Chinner2
- Start date
hmm not bad suggestion but then again not many times is there a lot of rule-breakers with high warning levels on at the same time usually there is 1 or 2 and they are usually easy to remember who exactly they are
I could see this used. It's a little hard keeping track of who is online and who isn't, especially if you're on for several hours and people are moving in and out.
It could be worth it. Say 5-6 people log-on, and the ops leave and others replace them. No one will have any idea these high warnlevel because they did NOT just login. It would be a useful command for when another Operator logs on and uses it. I don't see the coding being very hard for a command like this. So why not?
Your right. Very right. But, a high warnlevel shows repeated rule breaking. So I would think that kind of person would break rules again RATHER than someone who never breaks a rule.
EDIT:
Quote about improving things. “Without change there is no innovation, creativity, or incentive for improvement. Those who initiate change will have a better opportunity to manage the change that is inevitable.”
Since this command is pretty much an improvement, to the showing of a high warn level before someone joins.
Why make it Op+? It should be a Trusted command. We allow Trusteds to see warn level do we not? And yes, improvement is an amazing thing. Without improvement we would be nowhere. And there is always a way to make better a thing.
You'd be surprised how in the staff chat, even without this command, someone like 0x3c0 would exclaim 'xyz has a very high warning level.'
We don't use /highwarn at all. Neither am I interested in having /highwarn because it means staff will be keeping a closer eye on a repeated rulebreaker and be much less lenient to him, say, if he starts spambuilding WOOPS OH YOUR BANNED, whereas if we didn't have /highwarn we'd not even look at him until the spambuilding exceeds pathetic.
Well, you can add it, but I certainly won't be making use of it.
We don't use /highwarn at all. Neither am I interested in having /highwarn because it means staff will be keeping a closer eye on a repeated rulebreaker and be much less lenient to him, say, if he starts spambuilding WOOPS OH YOUR BANNED, whereas if we didn't have /highwarn we'd not even look at him until the spambuilding exceeds pathetic.
Well, you can add it, but I certainly won't be making use of it.
Wow, I was generally thinking about suggesting this myself. Reason being a couple of days ago about 5 or 6 people logged in and I received high warn levels for all of them. I didn't get to see their names though as too many things were happening. Also I like to know who has a high warn level so I can look out for any auto kicks from them or so I can tell them they are on their last chance. I would very much like this to be added. I would use it.