Well I found the post I remember about aqua crying about misquoting:
And right under it is Inf's explaination:
And right under that is Aqua realizing he's made a mistake because Inf didn't misquote him so instead he's going meta with 'but why would Mafia call people out for misquoting its provable why would I do something like that if people can prove misquoting'. Which hes right is is provable... and it has been proven than he's been lying about misquoting. Doesn't make him innocent just cause he got caught. His post:
And after that is more pages of 'misquoted', 'out of context', 'notty come up with original arguments gosh' (may or may not be paraphrased) and a whole lot of Inf explaining how he didn't misquote 50 times, even now on this very page 6 pages after he orginally answered it which is the second quote in this post. I dont get why Inf has to explain himself 50 times over the last 6 pages when it's obvious that Aqua is in the wrong here. And I don't get why conversation is shifting to Rune when Aqua's been more scummy.
???????Wow look at that Aqua Inf provides proof yet again of how he didn't misquote you so yes my argument is very valid, and you know its not the only one but you choose to ignore it and try and discredit our arguments with some lies and accusations.
A) Why is me being wrong about inf misquoting me scummy anyway. It's not as if I directly lied in my opinion I still see he as mis quoting me in terms of TWG oog thing.
B)Thank you for finally putting some effort into ur forced lynch effort although again, how is me thinking inf unfairly quoted me scummy?
I've drank a fair bit and this is prolly really dum but idc at this point, notty is just plainly forcing a lynch on me and its irritating to say the least. She has no valuable reasons and just spews the same shit about me being scummy because I don't like my posts being taken out of context.