that'd be great actually please if you think that's a good idea to do nowI can easely claim if people want, although changing my name a small bit ofcourse
that'd be great actually please if you think that's a good idea to do nowI can easely claim if people want, although changing my name a small bit ofcourse
Okay, so let me think this through: you wanted aqua DEAD, you were 99% sure aqua was a mafia. You told me to vote AQUA because:TWG is my #1 suspect, I'm convinced he's scum at this point, he's vibing so off to me, and I don't believe he was being genuine in what he was saying at all - I just don't believe him, even after aqua's flip when I read over what he says again, none of it reads as a genuine scared townie to me, and something just seems really off about him, like really unnatural for TWG? and he spent a while yesterday arguing that no lynching was better because lynching someone in such a rush is bad for town and he doesn't think aqua is likely mafia, then suddenly flips over and says he's gonna vote aqua to 'be fair'? that just makes no sense to me and felt like he knew aqua was gonna flip town and wanted to get townie points for showing some resistance to it but then slapped on his vote to make sure aqua was lynched anyway
^^ for everyone who's not familiar with this, this is a VERY insanely cheap way of saying "I know aqua's gonna flip town so I'm gonna blame twg whenever he flips!". but thats NOT how it works.if aqua is mafia (99% sure he is) = dess mafia
if aqua is town (1% sure he is) = twg mafia
^THIS IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ANSWER TO WHAT YOU PROMISED ME (US). THESE READS ARE LIKE LITERALLY OPPOSITE OF WHAT AT LEAST I IMAGINED. IMAGINED A LIST WHERE YOU'D POINT OUT SOMEONES SNEAKY METHOD OF CONVINCING PEOPLE TO VOTE AQUA (SOUND FAMILIAR HMMM).77thShad - no opinion
HKCaper - his resistance to aqua feels genuine to me, I know he's recently started trusting his vibes more and that's kind of the exact impression I got, I want to say he's probably town?
Nottykitten - I don't disagree with anything she said or did necessarily but I think she's vibing third party
TWG - scum
Unusual_Dood - bla bla bla blah...
I seriously have big issues understanding how you after yesterdays lynch, where you were convinced Aqua was scum which turned out to be completly wrong, can again be so convinced another player is, when there is barely anything to go out from. On top of that I don’t see why you ONLY found him suspicious of being mafia after that lynch and ignore the rest of the playersTWG is my #1 suspect, I'm convinced he's scum at this point, he's vibing so off to me, and I don't believe he was being genuine in what he was saying at all - I just don't believe him, even after aqua's flip when I read over what he says again, none of it reads as a genuine scared townie to me, and something just seems really off about him, like really unnatural for TWG? and he spent a while yesterday arguing that no lynching was better because lynching someone in such a rush is bad for town and he doesn't think aqua is likely mafia, then suddenly flips over and says he's gonna vote aqua to 'be fair'? that just makes no sense to me and felt like he knew aqua was gonna flip town and wanted to get townie points for showing some resistance to it but then slapped on his vote to make sure aqua was lynched anyway
I said people not you <3that'd be great actually please if you think that's a good idea to do now
I don't even have to read this post to know it comes from scumOkay, so let me think this through: you wanted aqua DEAD, you were 99% sure aqua was a mafia. You told me to vote AQUA because:
1. He is scum
2. If he's not scum, "wE wIlL GaIN ValUAbLE iNfoRmaTIoN"
no, shit we didnt, when you realised that an aqua lynch was actually likely to happen, so instead, you pointed at ME:
^^ for everyone who's not familiar with this, this is a VERY insanely cheap way of saying "I know aqua's gonna flip town so I'm gonna blame twg whenever he flips!". but thats NOT how it works.
Let me tell you something, I PARTOOK IN THE LYNCH and you did too. the DIFFRENCE is that YOU LEAD THE LYNCH, YOU WERE certain, AND YOU TOLD US he was gonna flip MAFIA, and you TURNED everyone TO LYNCH AQUA. I was NOT A CORE member of getting aqua lynched, without me, there would probably be someone else who joined in in those last 8 minutes and hammered aqua, YOU WERE A CORE MEMBER OF THE AQUA LYNCH. when I VOTED AQUA I DID SO because the vocal majority supported it, I decided to vote aqua because I've been in such situation MYSELF where people are AWAY and the SHIT IS GOING DOWN IN 2 HOURS, I LITERALLY EXPLAINED THIS IN THE POST WHERE I VOTED AQUA.
OK IM GONNA WRITE THE REST IN CAPS.
I WILL GO BACK TO THE SECOND POINT INFFY MADE ABOUT AQUAS LYNCH:
^THIS IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ANSWER TO WHAT YOU PROMISED ME (US). THESE READS ARE LIKE LITERALLY OPPOSITE OF WHAT AT LEAST I IMAGINED. IMAGINED A LIST WHERE YOU'D POINT OUT SOMEONES SNEAKY METHOD OF CONVINCING PEOPLE TO VOTE AQUA (SOUND FAMILIAR HMMM).
HERE IS WHAT INFFY POSTED ABOUT THE DIFFRENT PLAYERS WHO VOTED AQUA (SHORTED IT SO YOU DONT SUFFER BRAINDAMAGE):
Comp - town
Dess - somewhat unsure
hip - town
HKCaper - town
Matty - town
Moog - no opinion
Nottykitten - 3rd party
Omni - town
Rune - town
TWG - mafia
ANYTHING WEIRD ABOUT THIS? YES, HE IS VIBING 6 OF THEM AS "TOWN", AND WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ME AND NOTTY, HE HAS GENERALLY TOWN READ MOST OF THE PLAYERS PARTAKING IN A LYNCH AGAINST A TOWNIE DAY0. WELL LETS BE REAL HERE, ALL 6 OF THEM ARE NOT, AND I REPEAT ALL 6 OF THEM ARE NOT TOWN. ANYTHING ELSE THAT STANDS OUT? YES, THE PERSON WHO WAS MOST VOCAL AGAINST A LYNCH, AND DECIDED, FOR THE SAKE OF THE VOCAL MAJORITY, TO LYNCH AQUA WAS THE ONE WHO INFFY DECIDED MUST BE MAFIA. INFFY DID NOT ONLY WANT AQUA TO BE BLAMED, HE LITERALLY READ MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED AQUA AS "TOWN".
TL:DR
INF SAID AN AQUA LYNCH WAS FOR THE BETTER GOOD BECAUSE: 1. HE WAS SCUM AND 2. BECAUSE OF THE "READS" HE WOULD GET FROM IT. HE FAILED BECAUSE 1. AQUA FLIPPED TOWN AND 2. HIS READS ARE NOT ONLY NOT-FULFILLING, THEY'RE ALSO PAINFULLY OBVIOUSLY WRONG.
vote inffy
(tho I still love you inf, I hope this didnt get too heated)

I had a good reason to be convinced aqua was scum thoughI seriously have big issues understanding how you after yesterdays lynch, where you were convinced Aqua was scum which turned out to be completly wrong, can again be so convinced another player is, when there is barely anything to go out from. On top of that I don’t see why you ONLY found him suspicious of being mafia after that lynch and ignore the rest of the players
You're hoping to kill someone before you, inevitably, are lynchedI don't even have to read this post to know it comes from scum
I have never in my life seen you type like this, and I've also never seen you as scum
Okay sure that interpretation is possible, but why do you think this is the truth? why does this interpretation seem more likely to you than that those are my genuine thoughts? because to me this reads as 'you're attacking me so I'll quickly attack you back to save my life'Okay, so let me think this through: you wanted aqua DEAD, you were 99% sure aqua was a mafia. You told me to vote AQUA because:
1. He is scum
2. If he's not scum, "wE wIlL GaIN ValUAbLE iNfoRmaTIoN"
no, shit we didnt, when you realised that an aqua lynch was actually likely to happen, so instead, you pointed at ME:
^^ for everyone who's not familiar with this, this is a VERY insanely cheap way of saying "I know aqua's gonna flip town so I'm gonna blame twg whenever he flips!". but thats NOT how it works.
hold on a minute, didn't you say yesterday that you find it unlikely that mafia leads a lynch on town? and now I'm mafia because I lead the lynch, and you're mister innocent because you resisted? what changed?Okay, so let me think this through: you wanted aqua DEAD, you were 99% sure aqua was a mafia. You told me to vote AQUA because:
1. He is scum
2. If he's not scum, "wE wIlL GaIN ValUAbLE iNfoRmaTIoN"
no, shit we didnt, when you realised that an aqua lynch was actually likely to happen, so instead, you pointed at ME:
^^ for everyone who's not familiar with this, this is a VERY insanely cheap way of saying "I know aqua's gonna flip town so I'm gonna blame twg whenever he flips!". but thats NOT how it works.
Let me tell you something, I PARTOOK IN THE LYNCH and you did too. the DIFFRENCE is that YOU LEAD THE LYNCH, YOU WERE certain, AND YOU TOLD US he was gonna flip MAFIA, and you TURNED everyone TO LYNCH AQUA. I was NOT A CORE member of getting aqua lynched, without me, there would probably be someone else who joined in in those last 8 minutes and hammered aqua, YOU WERE A CORE MEMBER OF THE AQUA LYNCH. when I VOTED AQUA I DID SO because the vocal majority supported it, I decided to vote aqua because I've been in such situation MYSELF where people are AWAY and the SHIT IS GOING DOWN IN 2 HOURS, I LITERALLY EXPLAINED THIS IN THE POST WHERE I VOTED AQUA.
empathised*I don't believe for one minute that you did that because you suddenly emphasised
if I'm lynched today I completely understand why that is, I did softclaim cc a proven townie after allYou're hoping to kill someone before you, inevitably, are lynched

also to clarify, I'm not 'only' suspicious of him after the lynch, I said this yesterday as well, aqua flipping inno just made me 100x more convincedI seriously have big issues understanding how you after yesterdays lynch, where you were convinced Aqua was scum which turned out to be completly wrong, can again be so convinced another player is, when there is barely anything to go out from. On top of that I don’t see why you ONLY found him suspicious of being mafia after that lynch and ignore the rest of the players
oops missed this bitI WILL GO BACK TO THE SECOND POINT INFFY MADE ABOUT AQUAS LYNCH:
^THIS IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ANSWER TO WHAT YOU PROMISED ME (US). THESE READS ARE LIKE LITERALLY OPPOSITE OF WHAT AT LEAST I IMAGINED. IMAGINED A LIST WHERE YOU'D POINT OUT SOMEONES SNEAKY METHOD OF CONVINCING PEOPLE TO VOTE AQUA (SOUND FAMILIAR HMMM).
HERE IS WHAT INFFY POSTED ABOUT THE DIFFRENT PLAYERS WHO VOTED AQUA (SHORTED IT SO YOU DONT SUFFER BRAINDAMAGE):
Comp - town
Dess - somewhat unsure
hip - town
HKCaper - town
Matty - town
Moog - no opinion
Nottykitten - 3rd party
Omni - town
Rune - town
TWG - mafia
ANYTHING WEIRD ABOUT THIS? YES, HE IS VIBING 6 OF THEM AS "TOWN", AND WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ME AND NOTTY, HE HAS GENERALLY TOWN READ MOST OF THE PLAYERS PARTAKING IN A LYNCH AGAINST A TOWNIE DAY0. WELL LETS BE REAL HERE, ALL 6 OF THEM ARE NOT, AND I REPEAT ALL 6 OF THEM ARE NOT TOWN. ANYTHING ELSE THAT STANDS OUT? YES, THE PERSON WHO WAS MOST VOCAL AGAINST A LYNCH, AND DECIDED, FOR THE SAKE OF THE VOCAL MAJORITY, TO LYNCH AQUA WAS THE ONE WHO INFFY DECIDED MUST BE MAFIA. INFFY DID NOT ONLY WANT AQUA TO BE BLAMED, HE LITERALLY READ MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED AQUA AS "TOWN".
TL:DR
INF SAID AN AQUA LYNCH WAS FOR THE BETTER GOOD BECAUSE: 1. HE WAS SCUM AND 2. BECAUSE OF THE "READS" HE WOULD GET FROM IT. HE FAILED BECAUSE 1. AQUA FLIPPED TOWN AND 2. HIS READS ARE NOT ONLY NOT-FULFILLING, THEY'RE ALSO PAINFULLY OBVIOUSLY WRONG.
vote inffy
(tho I still love you inf, I hope this didnt get too heated)
Did you even read my post, and there wasnt a vocal majority who wished for Aqua's death when I was voting no lynch.and you were dead against voting aqua the whole day, you said it wouldn't get us valuable information because it was rushed, and you thought he would flip town - you insisted this was the case even when it was clear the majority of us wanted aqua dead, then suddenly changed your mind before going to bed. I don't believe for one minute that you did that because you suddenly emphasised with how when you've wanted a lynch and people have been 'away' - you weren't away, you were disagreeing, so it wasn't even the same situation.
KEY WORD: UNLIKELY. AND EVEN IF SO, I DIDNT (MAINLY) VOTE YOU BECAUSE YOU VOTED AND LEAD THE LYNCH ON AQUA. I VOTED YOU BECAUSE OF THE DISSAPOINTING LIST THAT DIDNT MAKE SENSE AND IT DIDNT TAKE IN ANY VALUE OF YESTERDAYS LYNCH. also read my post I answered it there.hold on a minute, didn't you say yesterday that you find it unlikely that mafia leads a lynch on town? and now I'm mafia because I lead the lynch, and you're mister innocent because you resisted? what changed?
UMM NO, YOU SAID YOU WOULD GET VALUABLE INFORMATION FROM THE AQUA LYNCH. AND WHAT YOU FOUND OUT WAS THAT I WAS MAFIA, WHICH IS PLAIN WRONG. AND YES IT DOESNT PROVE ME, but read my post I answered it thereI don't care if you weren't a 'core member of the aqua lynch', that in no way proves you. you said yourself it wouldn't as black and white as that - I can go get the quote if you want. so why is it suddenly like that?
okay so you disagree with my conclusions, so what do you get from yesterday's lynch then? because you've given 0 opinions of your own, you're just screaming that I'm wrong so obviously I'm scum without actually giving any reasons for why I'm wrongDid you even read my post, and there wasnt a vocal majority who wished for Aqua's death when I was voting no lynch.
KEY WORD: UNLIKELY. AND EVEN IF SO, I DIDNT (MAINLY) VOTE YOU BECAUSE YOU VOTED AND LEAD THE LYNCH ON AQUA. I VOTED YOU BECAUSE OF THE DISSAPOINTING LIST THAT DIDNT MAKE SENSE AND IT DIDNT TAKE IN ANY VALUE OF YESTERDAYS LYNCH. also read my post I answered it there.
UMM NO, YOU SAID YOU WOULD GET VALUABLE INFORMATION FROM THE AQUA LYNCH. AND WHAT YOU FOUND OUT WAS THAT I WAS MAFIA, WHICH IS PLAIN WRONG. AND YES IT DOESNT PROVE ME, but read my post I answered it there
yes, because it was one of the key elements of the Aqua lynch. Yes. Because I didn't try to get lynch someone, and promise a list of who would be scum and who would not be scum based off of it - and it cannot be understated that it was supposed to be 'useful' for us later.so you're saying that because I didn't deliver what you imagined, I'm scum? why? do you disagree with my analysis then? and why are you not giving your own reads from it?
Statistically speaking it's unlikely + if we consider the fact that the mafia probably were a key factor in lynching aqua, I'd guess that at least 1 of those players are mafia or even 3rd party.and TWG why are you so certain that all of those 6 people aren't town?
BECAUSE I DIDNT PROMISE A LIST OF PEOPLE I WOULD SUSPECT TO BE SCUM, TOWN, ETC.okay so you disagree with my conclusions, so what do you get from yesterday's lynch then? because you've given 0 opinions of your own, you're just screaming that I'm wrong so obviously I'm scum without actually giving any reasons for why I'm wrong
I've given several reads that have their roots in yesterday's lynch?
why are you not giving me yours?
but I've given you exactly what I said I would, I've given you my reads based on aqua's flip, you've read them because you've quoted themyes, because it was one of the key elements of the Aqua lynch. Yes. Because I didn't try to get lynch someone, and promise a list of who would be scum and who would not be scum based off of it - and it cannot be understated that it was supposed to be 'useful' for us later.
mafia don't have to have been a key factor in lynching aqua - I understand why you'd be cautious of everyone voting him but from the way he was acting I don't find it difficult to believe that a lot of townies voted him at all, with the help of a couple scum - namely you and nottyStatistically speaking it's unlikely + if we consider the fact that the mafia probably were a key factor in lynching aqua, I'd guess that at least 1 of those players are mafia or even 3rd party.
so is your whole argument 'YOU PROMISED ME A LIST AND I DID IN FACT GET ONE BUT IT'S WRONG BECAUSE I'M A SUSPECT SO YOU'RE SCUM AND EVERYONE SHOULD *KNOW* THIS'BECAUSE I DIDNT PROMISE A LIST OF PEOPLE I WOULD SUSPECT TO BE SCUM, TOWN, ETC.
AND EVEN WHEN YOU DELIVERED THE LIST, IT IS OBVIOUSLY AND PAINFULLY WRONG (I THINK EVERYONE KNOWS THIS)
*KNOW* THIS meaning know that the list is wrong*so is your whole argument 'YOU PROMISED ME A LIST AND I DID IN FACT GET ONE BUT IT'S WRONG BECAUSE I'M A SUSPECT SO YOU'RE SCUM AND EVERYONE SHOULD *KNOW* THIS'
for a townie to do*none of this makes any sense to me as a townie to do