Also Nottykitten what were the hidden flaws in the other plan you didn't want to reveal?
I think you'll need to text your friends to find that outOkay I'm hungover tae fuck so could someone explain what happened last night in one paragraph?
Notty wants literally everyone to claim for so town only lynches villager claim.Okay I'm hungover tae fuck so could someone explain what happened last night in one paragraph?
Well the first flaw is what happened last game where 5 town members were in the council. When that happens we either lynch a town member or install a dictator who will be known immediately then.Also Nottykitten what were the hidden flaws in the other plan you didn't want to reveal?
Reading over Notty's plan, it could work, but it relies on the antitown not immediately going after the doc/toxicologist, which seems very unlikely.
Mafia won't go for the doctor/toxicologist and they also won't be going for the dictator. If they leave the assassin alive that means next night we'll be able to have a second kill again meaning theres a decent chance another one of them is dead. + mafia don't care about doctors since if the doctor even thinks about protecting the assassin the mafia can just switcheroo the assassin and granny and then the doctor dies.Tbh I didn't consider this happening but if they do that and make us waste a day of electing a new democracy then that makes it a lot less likely we'll win if we do this plan
we discussed this last time in the council meetingSecond one is a bit more hidden but was my plan on killing the protestor. The protestor can roleblock one of the council members each night during democracy. With 3 unCC'd people in the council, theres realistically only 2 people left the protestor can roleblock. Since everyone who attends court is roleblocked, and me pressing last game that Aqua should attend court so they he's roleblocked, that leaves the protestor with only 1 person they could roleblock to have an effect which is the other non-proven player (Danni last game). My plan was to use our bus driver to switch Danni onto our granny so that the protestor would almost guaranteed die that night essentially giving us an extra kill besides our poison/nightkill.
I mean it was too late by then since the protestor wasn't in that council meetingwe discussed this last time in the council meeting
But the issue is one or two mafia can just claim pr and our claims are either useless or we have to mass claim all of the individual roles. If we're not willing to mass claim each role individually we shouldn't even think of doing a mass claim of PR vs non PRWell the first flaw is what happened last game where 5 town members were in the council. When that happens we either lynch a town member or install a dictator who will be known immediately then.
Second one is a bit more hidden but was my plan on killing the protestor. The protestor can roleblock one of the council members each night during democracy. With 3 unCC'd people in the council, theres realistically only 2 people left the protestor can roleblock. Since everyone who attends court is roleblocked, and me pressing last game that Aqua should attend court so they he's roleblocked, that leaves the protestor with only 1 person they could roleblock to have an effect which is the other non-proven player (Danni last game). My plan was to use our bus driver to switch Danni onto our granny so that the protestor would almost guaranteed die that night essentially giving us an extra kill besides our poison/nightkill.
Mafia won't go for the doctor/toxicologist and they also won't be going for the dictator. If they leave the assassin alive that means next night we'll be able to have a second kill again meaning theres a decent chance another one of them is dead. + mafia don't care about doctors since if the doctor even thinks about protecting the assassin the mafia can just switcheroo the assassin and granny and then the doctor dies.
I did however completely forget that the Mafia also has a roleblocker which does hurt this plan because they can roleblock the assassin, so I think we should instead abstract the roleclaims a bit much like we did last game with the 3 council claims. Instead of all claiming their specific role they claimed to be one of the 3 chosen town roles(Reticent, Vengeful and Bulletproof). Like I said before we could try some variant of claiming PR and non-PR.
I'm one of the three relevant roles for last game's plan, dunno about myui do find it interesting that myu and hunter want to be in the council though, so i kinda want to know why that is
Assassin is a full-blown vigilante in autocracy.Assassin kills by poison during democracy, and maf has a dual poisoner/toxicologist
idk if i'm being dumb or not but (i assume that this plan meant the people not claiming like the plan with just 3 of them) but a/several mafia can just lie and say they're one of the four, and then the actual however many town roles will all think they're the fourth PR and so they don't need to claim/speak up against the three who have claimed, leading to a possible majority mafia council night 1 instantlyInfected_alien8_ opinions on this?
Have three of the four roles (whistleblower, reticent, vengeful, bulletproof) speak up, vote in whoever three speak first, then if one of the members dies, have the fourth speak up to replace them without any of the roles being revealed
that way we have town majority for at least two days
tbf, if maf are on council, easier to lynch themidk if i'm being dumb or not but (i assume that this plan meant the people not claiming like the plan with just 3 of them) but a/several mafia can just lie and say they're one of the four, and then the actual however many town roles will all think they're the fourth PR and so they don't need to claim/speak up against the three who have claimed, leading to a possible majority mafia council night 1 instantly
people seem to have moved on from this plan anyway!
Democracy (with some council changes ofcourse since people are dying left and right). If a dictatorship happens in those scenarios it does mean the town gets to kill 1 person but at the same time it means that the town will have a no-lynch on a later day and thus lose another 2 people in the night.tbf, if maf are on council, easier to lynch them
alternatively all four roles could claim but w/e
Nottykitten do your tables last post assume the first democracy stays the whole game, or if we go dictatorship?
Explain to me how the toxicologist is relevant in any scenarioAlso, toxicologist can hand out antidotes to anyone, and they're then immune to one poisoning. They don't have to already be poisoned for the antidote to be relevant
Maf's second kill is poison which is delayed one day, same as Russian Maf's mechanic iircExplain to me how the toxicologist is relevant in any scenario
Bus driver can just swap the poisoned person with grannyMaf's second kill is poison which is delayed one day, same as Russian Maf's mechanic iirc
Toxicologist can nullify this kill to an extent as it can be cancelled by either having an antidote beforehand or announcing you've been poisoned and having the toxicologist deliver you the antidote
Yeah, which ties them up for the night.Bus driver can just swap the poisoned person with granny
So if one maf remains and it isn't them, they don't have their killYeah, which ties them up for the night.
Also remember it takes two maf to kill a player unless the maf attempting the kill is Gula, who can do it alone
Tbh I'm a bit confused as to what you're getting at, I keep seeing you post little bits of toxicology trivia but I feel like I'm missing your pointYeah, which ties them up for the night.
Also remember it takes two maf to kill a player unless the maf attempting the kill is Gula, who can do it alone