Raising /tp perms

gettinthere

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
202
Reaction score
147
Points
28
Sometimes, people want complete privacy from the full world. This doesn't concern players, but this is for builders and advanced builders.

Some people don't want prying eyes in their plots, but noone uses /plotme deny. People don't use whispers, instead they talk about their build freely in main chat. If you have it out in the open, but don't want people coming to you, keep it a secret in the first place. No, no, I am not insisting I am part of the NSA, but I just want to see great builds that are mentioned in chat. This is a public server, and it's a free creative server.

It's a shame to keep raising permissions, but I'm just disappointed to be shoo'd away when I arrive already when I want to see other builds. After all, what good does it that you freely talk about secret projects in the open. That's the same as having a group call with enemies and sharing your plans.

TL;DR (lazy reader) - Raise /tp perms and have anyone below OP use the Bring/Call System.

Edit: Raxo. Mister. You better reply on why you disagree with me. You must state your evidence, this is a public server and I feel that Bring/Call system is necessary.

People say their builds are great. It's so great and mighty, noone but OPs can see it!
This is a build server, we help each other to be better. We don't reserve special rights.
 

Marlem

Your local hall haunter
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
346
Reaction score
383
Points
63
TL;DR (lazy reader) - Raise /tp perms and have anyone below OP use the Bring/Call System.
I disagree with this because: what if people want to show something and the others actually want to see?

Really, what I'm trying to say is why not have a command that raises the tp perms of an INDIVIDUAL rather than raising them for the entire server. If it's for an individual, they won't get bothered by others, when the other people can teleport freely. This seems better altogether.
 

nitasu987

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
1,912
Reaction score
991
Points
108
Well, I think that being builder means you're now a mainstream player, whilst the player rank is more of a guest. Seeing that ranking up to builder is harder now, and builders can /tp whilst the player must /call , I believe the /plotme deny idea is great, for those who don't want to have their projects revealed. Builders being able to /tp is part of what makes a builder a builder, the privilege of free /tp. Advbuilders have it too, and the fact that you think only Op+ should have /tp is ridiculous in my opinion. Builders, Adv's, Op's, etc. have built and earned their ranks, while players have not yet. I agree that it is annoying to have people randomly tp'ing to you, so I believe the /plotme deny would work, but not raising the /tp perms. That happened once and then they reverted it.
 

nitasu987

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
1,912
Reaction score
991
Points
108
I also think this is a great idea, where is the hassle in just typing /call name. Easy as tping and it can be denied/accepted.
To me, it's a privilege to have it, and builders earn it. We don't want builders being grouped in with players. We've earned it, they haven't, so let us have the easy tp. Duh :D
 

Sephhh

Supermegauber Foxy Fox!
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
414
Reaction score
572
Points
63
Website
blocktopia.net
Aside from the reasons stated above, I don't want to be bothered while building my stuff, buy I really don't mind people just going in and see what I am doing. Say I'm building something, and someone requests to come, I'd rather continue building than go and accept a couple of requests. I don't want to request for a tp to someone because it might feel bothering them, if I'd just want a silent look at it. I'm not lazy to type /bring and so, I just don't want to destroy the momentum. Also in some instances when you're showing this guy a couple of stuff and they keep on requesting calls. I don't know, but this is how I feel. I think tp is enough for builder, however if you really would want to implement this idea, a tptoggle would be so much better, and I myself would agree on that.
 

JKangaroo

Your Local, Neighborhood Marsupial
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
610
Reaction score
2,132
Points
93
Alright, so I don't entirely know how to phrase or write this, and its very hard to write this without continually getting pissed off (a norm when differing opinions clash) and its rendering me unable to fully write out a response I would feel content with than I would otherwise, however, I will attempt to write this despite that obstacle.

First, as it has to be said when it comes to these things, I, at least as I currently stand, I am not an extremely avid participant on Buildbox though I have been trying to get back into the server as of late, and because of this standpoint, I am not entirely well versed in the workings and just many of the general commands that are apart of the server as a whole.
Despite this however, an opinion is an opinion, and as this idea generally affects everybody on the server, every opinion matters no matter the inexperience on the server.

Now, before I get into my post, let me say that due to my inexperience in commands, I do not entirely know what this "/tptoggle" is, however, I am generally assuming it is merely a command that lets the user allow or disallow any Teleporting to them until retoggled.
If so, then I am totally on board with that idea/plan, and give my support to it, as it would actually be a fantastic addition to the server. As what Sephhh said, it gives power to the individual, unlike the general idea of the original post...
...which I actually kind of abhor to a degree.

Let me say that I---
I would most likely place myself in the grouping of people who... I guess really don't care if a player wants to teleport to me or not: it just doesn't bother me, and from my perspective, I don't understand why such a system (in the original post) would be put into place just for that reason, though I can understand the idea of wanting some privacy.

Ever since it was put into place, I've never had a huge attachment to the Call/Bring system on Buildbox, and on a normal case-by-case basis, continually wondered why it was even in place.
To me, (and these are all opinions, which this entire thread essentially is), the Call/Bring system brought nothing of value to the server:
To me, it felt like an unneeded extra phase, a hassle that generally added less my Buildbox experience.
I actually felt very... I would say... anxious? embarrassed? there isn't entirely quite a word I can place to describe it, however,
I am one of those people who tend to allow or accept a request, even if it was the smallest of ideas or tasks and even if I didn't/don't entirely want such a request to be accepted, I would normally go for it as a denial would feel out of place and doesn't seem like the proper approach to the thing.
This is the case, because I would always ask, "Why Not?"

But really, isn't that the case about this whole topic:
Why Not let them teleport to you?
Is it going to hurt you to the degree of mental, emotional, or physical damaging? Not really.
Is it going to possibly take away from building? Yes, there is that possibility, but only for a few seconds or mere minutes and thats even if you decide to take action against it, and I'm certain you can spare at least those few moments.
Again I ask, Why not let them teleport to you?

I've generally been one of those people whom for the longest time has believed there really isn't anything wrong with teleporting, and in fact, I consider it a very good thing because...
Well really... What is Building and Architecture and Color and Shapes and Sizes and all that which encompasses this type of expression?
Well... Isn't it merely a form of art?

Whether Art or not, no matter the field, we, as humans, have tried to improve on what has been done before, what is being composed in the present, and just generally anything we come across or see that tends to pique our interests.
The viewing of other people's builds can always give off that sense of inspiration if one doesn't entirely have an idea on what they want to build. Perhaps they would take the block composition, a general theme or shape of a structure, or really anything they could incorporate later into something they crafted themselves.
It essentially is something that could HELP a builder, and not hurt them in any shape or form; and this is probably why I absolutely do not understand your argument in the initial post.
You even say it there:
This is a build server, we help each other to be better. We don't reserve special rights.
The idea of the allowance of teleporting CAN essentially be helpful, and I don't see how implementing the
"bring/call" system back into play contributes anything to the server at all.

In fact, your reasoning doesn't make sense to me in even bringing this system back up again.
People don't use whispers, instead they talk about their build freely in main chat. If you have it out in the open, but don't want people coming to you, keep it a secret in the first place. No, no, I am not insisting I am part of the NSA, but I just want to see great builds that are mentioned in chat. This is a public server, and it's a free creative server.

...but I'm just disappointed to be shoo'd away when I arrive already when I want to see other builds. After all, what good does it that you freely talk about secret projects in the open...
From what I have read in the initial post, this is essentially coming from a single form of event (though it may have happened over a number of circumstances) however,
Honestly...
And I apologize for being fairly apathetic here but...
Seriously, if something like this happens well...
Get over it.
This is something that happens, and it doesn't matter that it happens.
People can do this, and really have the right to do this. It may be annoying yes, however, in the end that situation becomes a case of your opinion against mine in which essentially nobody is right, as again, that is an opinion.

Tl;dr -> I don't want to see the terrible and silly Call/Bring system back. Its very much an unneeded device and essentially drags the whole server down into a proposition that people are on both sides are on, and in the end makes nobody happy.

Include that /tptoggle command instead, because that seems fantastic, and once again, as Sephhh said, it leaves it down to the INDIVIDUAL to decide.
Because I know I don't want a single thread to suddenly decide whom I can and cannot teleport to.

In fact, I feel nitasu987 is generally correct as well.
The majority of active players are either Builder or up.
That leaves that sense of responsibility, you should use that teleport usage wisely,
and becoming builder, I would say you essentially accept the fact that people WILL teleport to you, as well as the other way around in which YOU will instead teleport to others.

Again, this isn't a very well-written post due to it being 2 in the morning and I generally can't get all my thoughts together but eeeeeeeeeeeeh, what can you do about that.

Edit:
Edit: Raxo. Mister. You better reply on why you disagree with me. You must state your evidence, this is a public server and I feel that Bring/Call system is necessary.
This isn't entirely a thing needed to be said, but I like being thorough and discuss everything I have a problem with.
Now, despite raxo mistakenly clicking the wrong rating...
This Edited statement shouldn't even be here.
No, just because someone disagrees does not mean they MUST state anything.
Don't go around forcing someone that they MUST explain why they dislike or disagree or anything like that.
People don't have to respond to something like that.
If that's someone's opinion, then its someone's darn opinion, and there is nothing to it but that. People do have the right to remain silent, they don't have to respond pass a rating if they do not feel like it, want to, or can't even entirely put into (understandable) words on said reasoning.
This statement is generally just rude, and really has no place here.
 

nitasu987

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
1,912
Reaction score
991
Points
108
I don't have a single problem with people tp'ing to me. Honestly. I don't like this. Why can't we just block certain people from tp'ing to us.
I'd like that. We could be able to EX: /tpban Xfolo , and then /tpunban Xfolo

There could also be /tpban -a to ban everyone from tp'ing to you (except ops if possible) and /tpunban -a. Just an idea if it's possible
 
  • Thank You
Reactions: Xfolo

Sploorky

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
1,890
Reaction score
3,656
Points
288
To me, it's a privilege to have it, and builders earn it. We don't want builders being grouped in with players. We've earned it, they haven't, so let us have the easy tp. Duh :D
You could also say that advbuilders could have a command such as kick because it's a privilege, and they earned it. Doesn't mean it's a good idea to give it to that command ;).


A /tptoggle would be a better alternative, but if that can't be done, I'm in full support of /call. Reason why? People like private builds sometimes. It's better to appeal to both the people in this discussion, those who don't care about others tping, and those who do. Tptoggle and /call would appeal to both of those parties. Keeping tp at builder wont.
 

nitasu987

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
1,912
Reaction score
991
Points
108
To me, it's a privilege to have it, and builders earn it. We don't want builders being grouped in with players. We've earned it, they haven't, so let us have the easy tp. Duh :D
You could also say that advbuilders could have a command such as kick because it's a privilege, and they earned it. Doesn't mean it's a good idea to give it to that command ;).


A /tptoggle would be a better alternative, but if that can't be done, I'm in full support of /call. Reason why? People like private builds sometimes. It's better to appeal to both the people in this discussion, those who don't care about others tping, and those who do. Tptoggle and /call would appeal to both of those parties. Keeping tp at builder wont.

I see what you're saying, and an Idea just popped into my head:

What if, if we were working on a private project, we could use a command, say... /privacy

this would make it so for any non-op to tp to you, they'd have to /call, but when it's off, those who can use /tp could tp normally.
 

Friendy

SMP Overlord & Events Manager
Admin
Donor
Survival Staff
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
2,528
Reaction score
1,402
Points
138
I'd like to remind everyone that you can ban users from your plots if you do not want them entering you plot, so if they teleport to you they are exiled from your plot. However, I fully support the idea of a /tptoggle and /call command. Adding these doesn't harm anyone and in my opinion has a lot more positives than negatives.
 

nitasu987

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
1,912
Reaction score
991
Points
108
I'd like to remind everyone that you can ban users from your plots if you do not want them entering you plot, so if they teleport to you they are exiled from your plot. However, I fully support the idea of a /tptoggle and /call command. Adding these doesn't harm anyone and in my opinion has a lot more positives than negatives.

We do have that?

Also, I'm still confused as to what /tptoggle does. Does it make it so that people can/can't tp to you? That seems like the perfect solution to me.
 

gettinthere

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
202
Reaction score
147
Points
28
You honestly have no business in seeing what I'm building. ((especially when I've just started and it looks like shit. :C))
This is one example where people feel much safer when noone gets to go to see their build. (It might be counter-intuitive to yell out how wonderful their build isn't, but some people just do anyway)
----------------
I disagree with this because: what if people want to show something and the others actually want to see?

Really, what I'm trying to say is why not have a command that raises the tp perms of an INDIVIDUAL rather than raising them for the entire server. If it's for an individual, they won't get bothered by others, when the other people can teleport freely. This seems better altogether.
I totally agree with this (and a /tptoggle command would be awesome). You have no idea how hard it is to build stuff for the servers without half of the server checking it out... x)
-------------------

Jkangaroo said:
The idea of the allowance of teleporting CAN essentially be helpful, and I don't see how implementing the
"bring/call" system back into play contributes anything to the server at all.

In fact, your reasoning doesn't make sense to me in even bringing this system back up again.
The post was hastily done. It was 12:14a and I had not done forethought into creating another command or done research prior to creating this thread, because my mom got cranky and had wanted me to sleep. "It's so late, you're on summer break. You can play tomorrow." "Mom, I have to deal with something with people." "Tell them to sleep too."
------------------
Jkangaroo said:
Seriously, if something like this happens well...
Get over it.
Oh, sorry bud, I am over it, before this post even was written. In all seriousness, some people just can't make up their minds when something this sudden happens.

Also, the attitude and argument to get-over-it is used to death. Let's go through the ban appeals and see if "get-over-it" will do good.
------------------
JKangaroo said:
In fact, I feel nitasu987 is generally correct as well.
The majority of active players are either Builder or up.
That leaves that sense of responsibility, you should use that teleport usage wisely,
and becoming builder, I would say you essentially accept the fact that people WILL teleport to you, as well as the other way around in which YOU will instead teleport to others.
Oh, I'm sorry. I need to accept the fact that people will teleport to me. I thought this was about other players and builders. (one being Uhtr5r, when I had visited his plane that he was working on with JubJubers and Zeus4200) I'm also sorry, as I skimmed through your post.

JKangaroo said:
In fact, your reasoning doesn't make sense to me in even bringing this system back up again.
The original post, as I didn't state in the original post, was hastily done. I'm sorry I hadn't told everyone I'm going to bed after that edit.

Anyhow, here's a generalized explanation of why I feel inclined to use that reasoning.
A player, or builder, or even advanced builder wants to tell the world that their build is wonderful. Yes, it is silly, but you'd be surprised that everyone is susceptible to this.

Since people are naturally curious, they want to visit of course. You'll read the commands later. Upon visiting without warning, the builder feels that they had their privacy broken. It's silly as it seems, but our players (not the rank) are naturally ill of knowing what they blurted out, much less even discuss their wonderful secret build in the public chat.

It's not me that's concerned about people teleporting to me, but I had wanted to include the reason why BB had /tp allowed in the first place and the idea of SMP in the first place (to be a community). I admit that the reasoning was poor, but the post was done anyway. Yes, it is of no excuse to hastily write posts that are poor, but without creating a poor arguement, I wouldn't have had alternatives to /tptoggle.

nitasu987 said:
Builders being able to /tp is part of what makes a builder a builder, the privilege of free /tp.
It is a right to earn commands. It is not a right to invade privacy. Also, being solely able to use /tp freely does not make any part of a builder a builder. What makes builders is your skills to build (be that commands or manually), not knowing how to use commands because that will make you 100% genuine when you can simply look up commands and how to use them.
------------------------------------
Right. Before you raise up an issue like this, have a search first to see if you can find anything similar.
If you had, you would of found this: http://blocktopia.net/forum/threads/tping-an-alternative.9488/
.
I, unfortunately, couldn't do research prior to posting and announcing that I hadn't done so. I will include ideas the in a consensus post.
------------------------------------
I'd like to remind everyone that you can ban users from your plots if you do not want them entering you plot, so if they teleport to you they are exiled from your plot. However, I fully support the idea of a /tptoggle and /call command. Adding these doesn't harm anyone and in my opinion has a lot more positives than negatives.
Teleports are sporadic, and some builders are not aware of the command /plotme deny. We can surely extend the arguments of the command too, because it looks like /plotme deny is for individuals.

We do have that?

Also, I'm still confused as to what /tptoggle does. Does it make it so that people can/can't tp to you? That seems like the perfect solution to me.
Prime example! (You'll get a response in the list below)
--------------------------------------
Sorry if I hadn't include some parts of anyone's argument. Here's what I make of the consensus agreement.

Sploorky said:
A /tptoggle would be a better alternative, but if that can't be done, I'm in full support of /call. Reason why? People like private builds sometimes. It's better to appeal to both the people in this discussion, those who don't care about others tping, and those who do. Tptoggle and /call would appeal to both of those parties. Keeping tp at builder wont.
Code:
/call -d -a
Deny all call prompts.

Code:
/call -a -a
Allow all call prompts.

Code:
/call -a {name1,name2,name3,..}
Allows certain calls from individuals to be automatically accepted.

Code:
/tp -d {-a,-n}
(Maybe another format?) Deny all or noone to teleport to you. Thought this would be better instead of typing out the full /tptoggle {-a,-n}

Code:
/plotme deny -a
An argument to the code that extends the command. This way, it isn't necessary to write down everyone's names.

Code:
/plotme deny -n
The other end of the command to allow everyone (except individuals already on the deny list) to come back onto your plot.
----------------------------------------------
Foreword below

JKangaroo said:
This isn't entirely a thing needed to be said, but I like being thorough and discuss everything I have a problem with.
Now, despite raxo mistakenly clicking the wrong rating...
This Edited statement shouldn't even be here.
No, just because someone disagrees does not mean they MUST state anything.
Don't go around forcing someone that they MUST explain why they dislike or disagree or anything like that.
People don't have to respond to something like that.
If that's someone's opinion, then its someone's darn opinion, and there is nothing to it but that. People do have the right to remain silent, they don't have to respond pass a rating if they do not feel like it, want to, or can't even entirely put into (understandable) words on said reasoning.
This statement is generally just rude, and really has no place here.
I'm sorry I came off as rude. Is it my fault that people feel the urge to not reply, but to state their opinion in one word?

I hadn't reverted my edit to not isolate Raxo, because by that time (2am), I have no access to any computers in my room upstairs and I am sure as hell not going boot up my living room PC and have this light downstairs to make my parents think there's a robber in the house. I will keep the edit there, to show my mistakes and not keep it a secret.

I personally feel offended when someone goes and yells that my action is unneeded without any evidence. That's the same as being Barrack Obama and hiding your key evidence for your argument. Why have an argument when you don't want to state your evidence? Will your argument live without evidence if it is first response?

"You have the right to remain silent." You know how many times the Miranda Rights have been told? In movies, in testimonies in court, and anywhere else? It's used so much to death, and in the real world of law, remaining silent doesn't do shit when you're up at a recording station. You can remain silent, but you prolong your stay at the recording station. Do you want to stay two weeks in jail? You know what you do instead? You spit out what you know (if you know how to rebuttal cops, because the law system is tricky), or remain silent and call a lawyer and have your lawyer speak for you. A simple "disagree" rating isn't going to deal justice to your argument. "My client disagrees with your officers on the alibi of my client's whereabouts." The officers, or anyone dealing with your case, is going to wonder how. Does it feel right if both of you remained silent to not discuss evidence against your testimony? Oh yeah sure, let's remain silent now. Let's see how that will prove our argument.

"This statement is generally rude and has no place here." Of course, it is rude. You just stated the obvious. Congratulations, I should be ashamed of myself for coming off rude. Remember kids, being rude and forcing people to speak is a no-no. We all should sing Kumbaya, because the Forums rating system is so nice to have and good enough to state your entire opinion. I didn't know that I should be respectful to someone that feels a simple dislike is enough to prove their argument.
 

nitasu987

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
1,912
Reaction score
991
Points
108
Hey, gettinthere , I never thought you were coming off as rude, dun' worry! <3

I agree that it is annoying when people are peeping in on private projects. (Whew, lots of alliteration.) I do that sometimes to my friends accidentally, not knowing they are doing something private. I don't think that the perms should be raised, because of my aforementioned reasons. But, I do like the /tptoggle idea.
 

Damer_Flinn

Resident Asha'man
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
888
Reaction score
975
Points
243
I'd like to remind everyone that you can ban users from your plots if you do not want them entering you plot, so if they teleport to you they are exiled from your plot. However, I fully support the idea of a /tptoggle and /call command. Adding these doesn't harm anyone and in my opinion has a lot more positives than negatives.
Teleports are sporadic, and some builders are not aware of the command /plotme deny. We can surely extend the arguments of the command too, because it looks like /plotme deny is for individuals.
Not done reading your post fully yet, but I figured I should mention that using "/plotme deny *" should block everyone.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Friendy

gettinthere

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
202
Reaction score
147
Points
28
Not done reading your post fully yet, but I figured I should mention that using "/plotme deny *" should block everyone.
Done, and done. Guess people can build in peace, if they know about the commands.

You should also include * in the instructions for /plotme deny.

Edit: Actually, what about those individuals who want to visit or work with you when you used /plotme deny *?
 

LizzzyxD

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Messages
93
Reaction score
690
Points
93
Website
www.instagram.com
Alright, so I don't entirely know how to phrase or write this, and its very hard to write this without continually getting pissed off (a norm when differing opinions clash) and its rendering me unable to fully write out a response I would feel content with than I would otherwise, however, I will attempt to write this despite that obstacle.

First, as it has to be said when it comes to these things, I, at least as I currently stand, I am not an extremely avid participant on Buildbox though I have been trying to get back into the server as of late, and because of this standpoint, I am not entirely well versed in the workings and just many of the general commands that are apart of the server as a whole.
Despite this however, an opinion is an opinion, and as this idea generally affects everybody on the server, every opinion matters no matter the inexperience on the server.

Now, before I get into my post, let me say that due to my inexperience in commands, I do not entirely know what this "/tptoggle" is, however, I am generally assuming it is merely a command that lets the user allow or disallow any Teleporting to them until retoggled.
If so, then I am totally on board with that idea/plan, and give my support to it, as it would actually be a fantastic addition to the server. As what Sephhh said, it gives power to the individual, unlike the general idea of the original post...
...which I actually kind of abhor to a degree.

Let me say that I---
I would most likely place myself in the grouping of people who... I guess really don't care if a player wants to teleport to me or not: it just doesn't bother me, and from my perspective, I don't understand why such a system (in the original post) would be put into place just for that reason, though I can understand the idea of wanting some privacy.

Ever since it was put into place, I've never had a huge attachment to the Call/Bring system on Buildbox, and on a normal case-by-case basis, continually wondered why it was even in place.
To me, (and these are all opinions, which this entire thread essentially is), the Call/Bring system brought nothing of value to the server:
To me, it felt like an unneeded extra phase, a hassle that generally added less my Buildbox experience.
I actually felt very... I would say... anxious? embarrassed? there isn't entirely quite a word I can place to describe it, however,
I am one of those people who tend to allow or accept a request, even if it was the smallest of ideas or tasks and even if I didn't/don't entirely want such a request to be accepted, I would normally go for it as a denial would feel out of place and doesn't seem like the proper approach to the thing.
This is the case, because I would always ask, "Why Not?"

But really, isn't that the case about this whole topic:
Why Not let them teleport to you?
Is it going to hurt you to the degree of mental, emotional, or physical damaging? Not really.
Is it going to possibly take away from building? Yes, there is that possibility, but only for a few seconds or mere minutes and thats even if you decide to take action against it, and I'm certain you can spare at least those few moments.
Again I ask, Why not let them teleport to you?

I've generally been one of those people whom for the longest time has believed there really isn't anything wrong with teleporting, and in fact, I consider it a very good thing because...
Well really... What is Building and Architecture and Color and Shapes and Sizes and all that which encompasses this type of expression?
Well... Isn't it merely a form of art?

Whether Art or not, no matter the field, we, as humans, have tried to improve on what has been done before, what is being composed in the present, and just generally anything we come across or see that tends to pique our interests.
The viewing of other people's builds can always give off that sense of inspiration if one doesn't entirely have an idea on what they want to build. Perhaps they would take the block composition, a general theme or shape of a structure, or really anything they could incorporate later into something they crafted themselves.
It essentially is something that could HELP a builder, and not hurt them in any shape or form; and this is probably why I absolutely do not understand your argument in the initial post.
You even say it there:
This is a build server, we help each other to be better. We don't reserve special rights.
The idea of the allowance of teleporting CAN essentially be helpful, and I don't see how implementing the
"bring/call" system back into play contributes anything to the server at all.

In fact, your reasoning doesn't make sense to me in even bringing this system back up again.
People don't use whispers, instead they talk about their build freely in main chat. If you have it out in the open, but don't want people coming to you, keep it a secret in the first place. No, no, I am not insisting I am part of the NSA, but I just want to see great builds that are mentioned in chat. This is a public server, and it's a free creative server.

...but I'm just disappointed to be shoo'd away when I arrive already when I want to see other builds. After all, what good does it that you freely talk about secret projects in the open...
From what I have read in the initial post, this is essentially coming from a single form of event (though it may have happened over a number of circumstances) however,
Honestly...
And I apologize for being fairly apathetic here but...
Seriously, if something like this happens well...
Get over it.
This is something that happens, and it doesn't matter that it happens.
People can do this, and really have the right to do this. It may be annoying yes, however, in the end that situation becomes a case of your opinion against mine in which essentially nobody is right, as again, that is an opinion.

Tl;dr -> I don't want to see the terrible and silly Call/Bring system back. Its very much an unneeded device and essentially drags the whole server down into a proposition that people are on both sides are on, and in the end makes nobody happy.

Include that /tptoggle command instead, because that seems fantastic, and once again, as Sephhh said, it leaves it down to the INDIVIDUAL to decide.
Because I know I don't want a single thread to suddenly decide whom I can and cannot teleport to.

In fact, I feel nitasu987 is generally correct as well.
The majority of active players are either Builder or up.
That leaves that sense of responsibility, you should use that teleport usage wisely,
and becoming builder, I would say you essentially accept the fact that people WILL teleport to you, as well as the other way around in which YOU will instead teleport to others.

Again, this isn't a very well-written post due to it being 2 in the morning and I generally can't get all my thoughts together but eeeeeeeeeeeeh, what can you do about that.

Edit:
Edit: Raxo. Mister. You better reply on why you disagree with me. You must state your evidence, this is a public server and I feel that Bring/Call system is necessary.
This isn't entirely a thing needed to be said, but I like being thorough and discuss everything I have a problem with.
Now, despite raxo mistakenly clicking the wrong rating...
This Edited statement shouldn't even be here.
No, just because someone disagrees does not mean they MUST state anything.
Don't go around forcing someone that they MUST explain why they dislike or disagree or anything like that.
People don't have to respond to something like that.
If that's someone's opinion, then its someone's darn opinion, and there is nothing to it but that. People do have the right to remain silent, they don't have to respond pass a rating if they do not feel like it, want to, or can't even entirely put into (understandable) words on said reasoning.
This statement is generally just rude, and really has no place here.
omg tl;read anyway lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Araidian