Emoji Mafia - Completed
- Thread starter Prizyms
- Start date
- Status
Why me specifically?
You could some sort of fool hoping that someone kills the actual vigilante so that it would look like they were the disguiser and became you and then you'd be lynched and win.
If there is no downside to the blocker revealing themselves then could you explain what the downside to mass claiming is??
Oh, the item. Okay, there's no reason not to come clean at this point.
I'm actually not vig, I'm a Villager that received an 100 (basically a night gun) and wanted to use it. I like how it's able to be used the night of reception.
Claimed vig to look more important than I am, and if we have night guns then there's no way there's a full vig since we could kill each other without Mafia's help. If I got cc'd, it'd be maf posing as vig since any town with kill abilities is super dangerous to them if left alive.
Weary there's no third parties here. Can't be fool.
I hate when town lies for a gambit but what you're saying makes a kind of sense, I guess.
If blocker won't claim/doesn't exist, then an item distributor claim would support his story
not getting good vibes from shades, not for the initial idea of being disguiser, but moreso just some general weird actions, mainly lying and asking if people received items.
why would you lie about being vig? what if there's an actual vig that cc's you? what if we lynch the actual vig, he comes up vig, and then we lynch you? that's just a super simple thing that could go wrong, why did you not think of that?
why would you ask if people received items? id imagine there's only one person in the game who gives out items, just from general mafia setups. why would more then one person have an item day 1?
just seems kinda shadey
i think as it currently stands shades makes the most sense to lynch shades cause the roleblocker can just claim tomorrow if it turns out we're wrong. not very comfortable with a trigger happy player in the game even if he does flip town
vote shades
why would you lie about being vig? what if there's an actual vig that cc's you? what if we lynch the actual vig, he comes up vig, and then we lynch you? that's just a super simple thing that could go wrong, why did you not think of that?
why would you ask if people received items? id imagine there's only one person in the game who gives out items, just from general mafia setups. why would more then one person have an item day 1?
just seems kinda shadey
i think as it currently stands shades makes the most sense to lynch shades cause the roleblocker can just claim tomorrow if it turns out we're wrong. not very comfortable with a trigger happy player in the game even if he does flip town
vote shades
also i think this logic is really wrong, don't play cocky, it's a closed setup
Shades is looking pretty damn suspicious right now, but at the same time I'm worried about a bandwagon.
There's his initial claim of vigilante and then claiming to be a villager, for one, plus the push for claims on Day 1, which I don't trust on principle.
I have a busy day ahead of me, so my activity may be sparse. Rest assured, however, I will keep up with the thread.
There's his initial claim of vigilante and then claiming to be a villager, for one, plus the push for claims on Day 1, which I don't trust on principle.
I have a busy day ahead of me, so my activity may be sparse. Rest assured, however, I will keep up with the thread.
I'm very inclined to vote Shades at this point, he's already been proven to lie already and therefore we can't trust him. I can see him getting bandwagoned but at this point in time, it looks like he either fucked up really hard as mafia and still got a villager killed or fucked up really hard as a villager and got a villager killed. Either way, he has been a detriment and is making my dodgyometer sweat.
I'm just glad no roleblocker claimed during all that. Sure I suppose Shades' story about trying to get a mafia to fake claim vigilante has the possibility to be true, but if a roleblocker claimed it would just be a claim for no reason because no it doesn't confirm a mafia. It's just as easily so that a doc save stopped the mafia kill. And thats not even mentioning that randomly shooting a gun n0 is anti-town.
I'm also worried about a bandwagon which is why I won't be voting for Shades in this post but I do find him very suspicious.
I'm also worried about a bandwagon which is why I won't be voting for Shades in this post but I do find him very suspicious.
Catching up on all the stuff that happened over the last 90 messages or so and I'm somewhat confused though I am trying to make sense of it.
Seems way too early to be doing any kind of crazy maneuver for the mafia, so at this point I'm leaning towards trusting Shade's account but still on the fence. Having odd vibes off Weary as well but I'm not going to vote for now.
Seems way too early to be doing any kind of crazy maneuver for the mafia, so at this point I'm leaning towards trusting Shade's account but still on the fence. Having odd vibes off Weary as well but I'm not going to vote for now.
Except that they can then be killed? Being safe from the disguiser doesn't make them safe from mafia.
Did you forget about Republic?
I agree with both of these, and think that Shades is probably a decent lynchee for now. I'm thinking about and kinda feel like maybe they're a mafia member who received the 100 then tried to make a play out of it and hoped the fact that it was partially true would help them pull it off.
- Status