Emoji Mafia - Completed
- Thread starter Prizyms
- Start date
- Status
I just woke up again to some interesting claims; haven’t fully caught up with the thread, but uhhhh there was something about my role I completely forgot about until I went to check my account details again that people might want to know straight away, so;
I’m the Defender. I defend people’s accounts from being stolen each night.
I, uh- I completely forgot another factor of my role and it took me looking back at the Discord message that told me what my role does, but-
Whoever I defend from getting account-stolen also ends up getting roleblocked, so;
In this order, I had defended; Expressionless, Hearts and Thinking. So if any one of you found yourselves unable to do anything, that was me. sorry for any inconvenience this might have caused.
I’m the Defender. I defend people’s accounts from being stolen each night.
I, uh- I completely forgot another factor of my role and it took me looking back at the Discord message that told me what my role does, but-
Whoever I defend from getting account-stolen also ends up getting roleblocked, so;
In this order, I had defended; Expressionless, Hearts and Thinking. So if any one of you found yourselves unable to do anything, that was me. sorry for any inconvenience this might have caused.
if anything the roleblock confirmation means im not full of shit about my own claim so that actually helps
your claim is pretty believable imo, but that means between you and blush there is apparently two roles that are town sided capable of roleblocking which doesnt make much sense...
one of you and blush might be maf, and i would disagree about your roleblocking not being the main purpose. it seems you're closer to a jailkeeper, and also never underestimate roleblocking;
the fact you visited expressionless n1 and hearts n2 is interesting and could potentially explain why n1 and n2 had no kills from the mafia, id like tohea
I had felt that both Expressionless and Hearts were trustworthy on the nights I had defended them; Hearts seems to have gone quiet as of late, though.
none of my actions’ targets thus far have been based on the roleblocking aspect of my role, and had i remembered its side effect last night i would not have aimed it at you
none of my actions’ targets thus far have been based on the roleblocking aspect of my role, and had i remembered its side effect last night i would not have aimed it at you
you are towntelling very well right now
n1 is mostly random anyway and its better to use your action than to not use it when blocking is considered. also we dont know if expressionless really was a cop, winking. expressionless could have been the disguiser and night 3 just disguised themself as the cop.
that’s true. that is true. that’s something i’ll have to keep in mind.
there’s something about the last few pages that really rub me the wrong way, but when i try to type it out it just ends up a scrambled mess. i’ll try to get it into a cohesive post, though.
Yep!
How does your role work? Can you only give away bulletproof vests and guns? Can you give the same player multiple items through nights?
There's a lot of contradicting statements going around so far but I want Angry , Hearts , Sob , and Sweat to claim before I can give an educated opinion. I think those are the only 4 who have not claimed yet?
I'm thinking that it's fairly likely mafia has a stalker seeing as how they hit the cop who wasn't really the focus of anything on previous days.
I'm looking back through right now and it really doesn't seem like Expressionless left us anything to go off. They didn't post very much at all and were strong advocates for both villager mislynches.
Joy is that your full claim? The name seems to have nothing to do with the role itself, which strikes me as a little odd!
Also
I'm thinking the more likely explanation for this is that I was redirected, not you. My results don't specify the person, just "target".
Okay, so this isn't the most damning of evidence but I feel like Joy has been using slightly different language today? Mainly the heavy use of hyphens instead of just using commas or starting a new sentence. Additionally, before today their punctuation was consistently lower case but now it's kind of inconsistent. They also seem much less blunt than before, at least to me. I also had a brief look at Mask and Blush, but Mask hasn't posted much and doesn't have many prominent typing habits from what I can tell. Blush seems fairly similar also but the consistently upbeat tone wouldn't be hard to imitate, to be fair. I've included my table of Joy posts below.
[xtable]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td=312x@}
before{/td}
{td=312x@}
after{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=312x@}
· why would you claim day one?
which type of vigilante are you?
· shades claiming as the day starts was compulsive and dumb. shades why would you claim to be a vigilante, instead of claiming to have received a gun?
· a vig would never counterclaim just nightkill them
· weary, you are way to trigger happy. from your point of view you are a villager, the mafia wont claim roleblocker out of nowhere just to frame a random villager. im not saying you are maf but this is genuine scummy behaviour.
i suggest we wait for everyone to share their opinions, and i want to hear from uused
· theres no reason to, and even if they did they would risk the chance of the real roleblocker ccing them which could get them lynch. theres no point in outing themselves to lynch a town.
· no item here either.
· looks like nobody had anything to add.
Vote Weary{/td}
{td=312x@}
· (oops didnt see this before now so sorry for not making a post)
since we're doing a massclaim, ill also claim
I am the balancer, each night I can visit a player. if they have a night action i'll get a yes, if they dont have a night action i'll get a no.
im confirming masks watcher claim because night 2 I visited yum and got an 'yes', aka they have/used (see above) an night action.
Im not gonna say who else I visited, because that would spoil all the fun about my role - I would rather everyone claim first, and I'll call out bs if I find any.
· nvm oops pretty sure my role tells me if they utilize a night action or not - in that case Yum is lying
· i either get a 'yes' or a 'no, as I got a 'yes' that clearly indicates you utilized an action night 2.
· just to be clear we shouldnt focus on yum right now - as my role is somewhat unclear. We should rather focus on the blantantly false claim by unamused earlier in the game;
1. According to unamused - yum visited nobody during the first day, which, according to yum, is untrue (see their claim higher up in this thread)
2. I cannot find any scenario where thinking is able to target himself - even with busdriver involved, it wouldn't be possible (if i did my maths right), only scenario where this would be possible is where theres a one-way busdriver.
· wait nvm I misred this - but the second point still stands!{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
[xtable]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td=312x@}
before{/td}
{td=312x@}
after{/td}
{/tr}
{tr}
{td=312x@}
· why would you claim day one?
which type of vigilante are you?
· shades claiming as the day starts was compulsive and dumb. shades why would you claim to be a vigilante, instead of claiming to have received a gun?
· a vig would never counterclaim just nightkill them
· weary, you are way to trigger happy. from your point of view you are a villager, the mafia wont claim roleblocker out of nowhere just to frame a random villager. im not saying you are maf but this is genuine scummy behaviour.
i suggest we wait for everyone to share their opinions, and i want to hear from uused
· theres no reason to, and even if they did they would risk the chance of the real roleblocker ccing them which could get them lynch. theres no point in outing themselves to lynch a town.
· no item here either.
· looks like nobody had anything to add.
Vote Weary{/td}
{td=312x@}
· (oops didnt see this before now so sorry for not making a post)
since we're doing a massclaim, ill also claim
I am the balancer, each night I can visit a player. if they have a night action i'll get a yes, if they dont have a night action i'll get a no.
im confirming masks watcher claim because night 2 I visited yum and got an 'yes', aka they have/used (see above) an night action.
Im not gonna say who else I visited, because that would spoil all the fun about my role - I would rather everyone claim first, and I'll call out bs if I find any.
· nvm oops pretty sure my role tells me if they utilize a night action or not - in that case Yum is lying
· i either get a 'yes' or a 'no, as I got a 'yes' that clearly indicates you utilized an action night 2.
· just to be clear we shouldnt focus on yum right now - as my role is somewhat unclear. We should rather focus on the blantantly false claim by unamused earlier in the game;
1. According to unamused - yum visited nobody during the first day, which, according to yum, is untrue (see their claim higher up in this thread)
2. I cannot find any scenario where thinking is able to target himself - even with busdriver involved, it wouldn't be possible (if i did my maths right), only scenario where this would be possible is where theres a one-way busdriver.
· wait nvm I misred this - but the second point still stands!{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Alright, so my highlighting in the second column didn't show up so if you want it it's here:
I also did up this table to try and wrap my head around the actions:
Do note that I forgot to include myself targeting Yum N1 and receiving no report.
The things that don't add up are as follows:
The things that don't add up are as follows:
- Joy claims to have received a report indicating that Yum used their night action (item giving) on night 2, when they claim they did not, and no players claimed to have received one.
- Unamused (me) claimed to have received a report indicating that Thinking visited themselves. This can be explained by my action being redirected by a bus-driver-esque role. I believe confusion was aroused by the fact that i didn't specify that my reports only state "target", leaving some ambiguity.
- I'm like 70% sure there was another one but I forgot so I'll throw in a short post later if I remember!
because i swear, there had been posts after the chart unamused set out, but they’re gone
and i thought i was imagining it, and kept refreshing the page
but no, it’s gone, and i’m wondering if i dreamed up the whole thing, but i swear there had been more posts earlier
and i thought i was imagining it, and kept refreshing the page
but no, it’s gone, and i’m wondering if i dreamed up the whole thing, but i swear there had been more posts earlier
Absolutely sure some did. There were 344 posts when priz posted the deadline, and now 345 (346 with mine).
Unamused could you please address the fact that mask knew who i visited n2 (yum), when you claimed i visited myself
its strange that you just ignored it when you posted that interesting chart
also im down with lynching unamused because the only evidence redirection even exists in this setup is their word on it, and at this rate im more willing to trust mask since they knew my n2 visit while in hindsight it seems anyone could claim redirection to get around not knowing who visited who
i think ill kick things off this time since a deadline was posted
vote unamused
its strange that you just ignored it when you posted that interesting chart
also im down with lynching unamused because the only evidence redirection even exists in this setup is their word on it, and at this rate im more willing to trust mask since they knew my n2 visit while in hindsight it seems anyone could claim redirection to get around not knowing who visited who
i think ill kick things off this time since a deadline was posted
vote unamused
- Status